They said they told him how researchers would induce hours-long heart attacks as part of efforts to improve medical imaging processes for humans.
If only you'd bother actually reading the whole article, the same phrase you took a bit from actually explains why they do that. But no, better to just attack the whole thing pretending we do that for fun.
Are you telling me that I should have diluted some bullet material, instead of trying to start by shooting myself with a small caliber and work up my immunity from that? All this work, wasted!
To add to your point, it used to be that the village idiot was just that, known for it, and shamed or shunned. Now that they can connect to other village idiots, they can find a community of like minded idiots that reinforces their beliefs.
we don't need ~~so many~~ MBAs ~~anymore~~
Fixed it for you ;)
I'll be the first to admit that I fell for his (initially) near perfect PR that crafted the industry genius image he's still coasting on to this day. Of course that took a nosedive when he started calling a rescuer "pedo" for pointing out the stupidity of his rescue submarine idea. But it wasn't until he started talking about IT that I finally started to understand he wasn't an average CEO manipulating public opinion to his advantage, but an absolute moron who actually never had any idea of what he was talking about. Yes the dude is that stupid, but good PR is actually hard to completely take down.
I too like thought-provoking takes backed by real world data...
You were asked for a source but continued your tinfoil hat-worthy drivel, problem here is on you not them.
As pointed out by another here, the problem is structural, and individual action cannot be the answer here.
I'm not sure drivers can even improve, that would mean setting higher requirements to get and keep your driver's license, and I don't ever see the automobile lobbies or car-centric society adhering to such changes.
Simply by the questions you ask, the way you ask them, they are able to infer a lot of information. Just because you're not giving them the raw data about you doesn't mean they are not able to get at least some of it. They've gotten pretty good at that.
And RGB LEDs, gotta remember those!
It does, maybe it's just not precise enough for you, but it does. Medical imaging for humans. What do you actually want?
I don't believe you're here to argue in good faith anyway.
Edit: I also notice that you carefully avoided another answer that goes into much more details than mine. Yeah you're not here in good faith.