fullofredgoo
First comment on the post:
James Kettle: Hi, I’m the author of this research. It’s great to see interest and I can promise some quality research and a strong argument to kill HTTP/1.1 but the headline of this article goes a bit too far. The specific CDN vulnerabilities have been disclosed to the vendors and patched (hence the past tense in the abstract) – I wouldn’t drop zero day on a CDN! That said I do expect to see fresh critical CDN vulnerabilities in future – hopefully found by a white hat!
4chan comes to mind. /fit/ would probably have a bunch of BS for you to trawl, /ck/ will probably have dietary misinfo, maybe /sci/ as well.
Wild Ones is an excellent resource for this sort of thing. Find a nearby chapter and they can supply you with wildflowers that are native to your local ecology, grown from seeds collected in that habitat.
Go to your nearest farmers market! Not only do you get to support local producers, but local honey is also better for your health. Bees produce all kinds of antibodies that get expressed in their honey, and those antibodies are specific to your local environment. My hometown has one of the largest honey producers in America, and I still go out of my way to buy local raw honey rather than the homogenized stuff from the larger company, because they mix honey from all over the country, and pasteurization neutralizes most of those beneficial antibodies. I don't know about European regulations on raw honey, but I would be shocked if you couldn't at least find raw honeycomb, which is pretty much guaranteed to be unadulterated.
From the article:
"The majority in this case made the independence of its analysis explicit, writing: "Montana case law interpreting the Individual Dignity provisions directs our analysis, not federal precedent." The dissent cited Trump v. Orr and Skrmetti—both hostile federal rulings—but the majority rejected them outright. What this means in practice is that Montana's transgender residents now have a constitutional shield completely independent of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decisions."