froztbyte

joined 2 years ago
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago

they should just touch GRASS

Guided Rationalist Acceptance of Socionormality Studies

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 3 months ago

brinish sports tabloids? yeah who knows what those salty fuckers undersea get up to, so slippery!

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

names for genai people I know of so far: promptfans, promptfondlers, sloppers, autoplagues, and botlickers

any others out there?

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I figured, but I couldn't just let a terrible pun slip me by!

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

(in networking it's common terminology to refer to "Lx" by numerical reference, and broadly understood to be in reference to this)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 3 months ago (6 children)

oldskool OSI appmanager is oldskool

(........sorry)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it's really recent. I think I saw it like 2 weeks ago? via the IACR toot feed iirc

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago

months later follow-up on this: I didn't switch away from radicale, but figured out the issue: apple stuff does not want full resource path, but rather /radicale/account@domain

it also gives damn useless feedback in in normal modes. it's spammy in debug but you can at least figure out what's going on

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago

oh yeah that paper was also fantastic :D

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"reported development" wat

I'm not sure I fully understand your comment here (it almost seems as though you're posting this as a "very recent" thing)? which is confusing because the body of work and implementations go back years. the current works around standardisation and such (as well as extending in specific protocols) is all around setting baselines

also, following on re diz's comment, to my knowledge the most recently fanfare'd quantum attack on an rsa-family algo was a whole whopping 22 bit integer. keep in mind that for this field, difficulty scales exponentially with every bit. and 2048/4096 rsa usage has been commonplace for a fair while even before ecdsa/ed25519/chacha/poly/etc all started picking up in popularity (which is also like 2014+). I have no good insights on the qubits development world to guess how far off we are (perhaps blake might have a guess here), but it feels a significant way off

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 3 months ago

sorry for the jumpscare while you’re on holiday :)

view more: ‹ prev next ›