franklin

joined 3 years ago
[–] franklin@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

He was just a sparkling Authoritarian before they invaded Poland

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate the pragmatism, and for what it's worth, I agree with your logic but voters aren’t pragmatists. They engage emotionally, which is why reactionary movements thrive.

Republicans offered an identity rooted in tribalism, fueled by fear, anger, and even hatred. Yet even a hateful tribe is still a tribe. In an era of loneliness and division, the group that accepts you flaws and all holds a powerful advantage. The side effect? Politics becomes emotional, not intellectual.

And let’s be honest: It’s hard to blame voters for disengaging. First-past-the-post, 'lesser of two evils' voting is demotivational at its core.

When every election feels like damage control, idealism withers.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i think they mean sometimes people leave fun on the table because of fomo

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

No it's their job to accurately communicate the effects to their readers, which they did.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

if they aren't safe no one in this industry is. Marvel Rivals is insanely successful.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

bye-bye fast food, hello real estate business

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Matrix is great but it's got the same problem as every other communication service, it's only useful when other people are on it.

I use it and encourage my friends to but they just look at me like I'm crazy

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know when I feel this way it's usually because work is burning me out.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i mean I'm glad they fact checked but... no fucking shit

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

at the rate the Senate's spine is deteriorating i suspect it to slip by their scoliotic corpse within a couple years.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, Dems have complacent leadership but they are definitely the much better of two bad options.

My point is even if you had ideal leadership, inevitably discontent of uncontrollable externalities would cause a tick-tock cycle between the two parties as reactionaries are just part of the human condition and the party willing to play dirty will always come out on top in a two party system.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

well that's kind of the point isn't it? every time the Republicans get in they do so much damage that it can't possibly be done in the inevitable swing back to the left that they create and then by the time they get back in because of all the reactionaries they just do more damage

kind of the end result of a two-party system if you think about it

 

I am incredulous as to the results of this study, but wanted to hear Lemmy's take.

view more: next ›