definitemaybe

I agree with virtually everything you said, and I still stand by my comment, too. This was Carney's only politically-viable response.

We can still respect that anyone's death is hard on their family. His children didn't choose who their father was, and they're going to grow up without him, now. I can empathize with their pain without supporting any of the (many) hateful things he's said and done.

Similarly, condemning political violence is a pretty reasonable take, even if only for the chilling effect political violence has on democracy. Democracy only works with open sharing of ideas, including from those we disagree with. For example, identifying that Kirk was a closed-minded, hateful bigot is important when discussing his legacy, and I shouldn't need to risk being lynched (or fired) for saying so.

It's also fair that politicians may not want to come out openly "trash talking" someone right after their death, as that will just be used as ammunition by their political opponents to increase political polarization. Saying "our thoughts are with the family in this difficult time" isn't taking a stance on anything, while also saying something so political opponents don't spin silence into a manufacturer controversy.

My understanding is that businesses have more rules than individuals.

I looked into this ahead of a meeting with my boss a few years ago about my future employment (my contact was expiring). I wanted to record the meeting in case there was something said that I might want to take to my union. Based on my reading at the time, my understanding is that individuals in Canada can record any of their private communication, with no limits, for personal storage and review.

I think that any individual can record any/all of their personal phone calls made anywhere in Canada without informing anyone else that a recording is being made.

I'm pretty sure this is incorrect. I'm not a lawyer, and the person I'm quoting below likely isn't either, but this lines up with my understanding:

In Canada we have one party consent, which means you can record a conversation you are part of. Doesn't matter where the other people are because you are in Canada and Canadian law applies to you at that time.

If the other party is in the USA then US law applies to them and the actions they take must conform with US law.... but US law doesn't dictate what you can do and Canadian law doesn't dictate what they can do.

However, one party consent has nothing to do with publishing. Releasing these recordings may breach privacy laws or if the information is confidential under an NDA you might be sued for revealing it.

Do you need to tell them? I never did. I just assumed there's some sort of government system to track which citizens are residents in each province, if nothing else to keep people from "double dipping" in two provinces' healthcare systems.

Then again, BC charges health premiums to seniors, right? So maybe keeping an AB health card is a way seniors might try to dodge that, I guess? (I'm just here on vacation, really!)

Nah. You need to laminate it yourself, which is technically not allowed for some reason, apparently, but everyone does it anyway.

Dementia and Parkinson's. That sucks.

My kiddos love listening to his self-narrated stories on Spotify. ("OK Google. Play Robert Munsch stories.") His love for children is so clear in his interactions with them in those recordings.

The article also suggests the "trade war" is the reason Canadians aren't traveling to the US, and not the plainclothes government thugs who could grab you off the street and hold you without any legal process in inhumane conditions indefinitely. Where a Canadian his died from being denied access to medications.

But yeah, right. It's the tariffs.

I mean... What are Canadian MPs supposed to do about US corruption? It's up to them to figure it out. It's the host country's choice where to host it; if the US administration chooses to line their own pockets, it's up to US legislators/courts to hold them to account.

Or am I missing something?

Literal newspeak, straight from 1984.

Lawnchair doesn't seem to allow gestures on icons/folders, so it's a non-starter for me. I use swipe actions all the time to launch apps. Like, tap for SMS, swipe down for WhatsApp, swipe up for Signal; or tap to open a folder of utilities, swipe up for Root Explorer and down for KeePass. I want to be able to launch all of my frequently used apps with 1 action from my homescreen. If anything, I'd like a launcher that allows even more swipe actions (right & left).

I just want a full app drawer and a single homescreen with shortcuts/folders that can be overloaded with swipe actions. IDGAF about widgets or search. If I need to type anything, I'm doing too much work to launch an app.

I think most people learned that because of COVID, didn't they? N95s (worn properly) block 95% of pm2.5, which takes a danger level of 400 μg/m³ (well into the hazardous range) down to 20 μg/m³ (about half the cutoff for "unhealthy").

Yet only a handful of people locally were wearing N95s when the levels were that high, locally. People just don't care about their health, I guess? Not sure how else to interpret it.