cerebralhawks

In a "Mac Pro" you want a Mac that is built like a PC, but Apple doesn't build Macs like that anymore.

The new Mac Pro is a Mac mini or Studio running a Pro chip (or higher). But it's not like the old Mac Pro.

You can't get a Macintosh Performa anymore, either, but you can buy an Apple Vision Pro. I wouldn't, but you can.

To be fair, all the Apple blogs are parroting it. It's not just this one.

Anya trying so hard to make you think there might be something other than air behind those big green eyes…

Sex scenes in games... makes me think of Mass Effect and the "Sex Box" controversy the Karens made up after that game was released.

I finally got through Mass Effect and saw the sex scene for the first time yesterday (Female Shepard, and Liara, the blue-skinned alien, if it matters) and wow, that was PG-13. You don't see anything! It's all implied! Might as well have been a fade-to-black sex scene.

I wonder what those Karens would say about Cyberpunk... full frontal nudity male and female, and actual explicit (R-rated) sex scenes (penetration isn't shown but is heavily implied).

If I were a Republican, I would want Trump to veto it. Simply because he has nothing to lose if Congress does have the votes to overturn a presidential veto. The Republicans that voted for the release look good and it helps their numbers. Trump isn't getting re-elected anyway, that's why he's digging so hard. It's actually a smart move for anyone in the party who isn't in the Epstein files. The idea is that those who are will quietly go away, and as for Trump, he's not going to get impeached or anything, because Congress doesn't have the votes, and if enough Republicans fought for the release of the files, they should do well next year against their Democrat challengers. Republicans keep the majority, no impeachment. That's probably the game plan.

He used to make games. He stopped making games to sell other people's games.

I get why people like Steam, but when people say you shouldn't play games that require other launchers, especially when all-in-one launchers like Playnite exist... I think people should get off his dick a bit.

The problem I have is that Valve used to make GREAT games. And there's so much trash and shovelware out there, it would be nice to see a good developer come back. The hope is that they will at least make good gaming hardware.

Honestly you're not missing much. There are good things in Invisible War, but the software was just bad.

The problem with Deus Ex was, they made a great computer game, but it could not run on Xbox and they had to struggle to get it on PS2. They had to basically remake the thing. They developed Invisible War for the Xbox first, PlayStation never (AFAIK), and the PC port was a bad port that suffered the problems of the Xbox version. (This was OG Xbox, not even Xbox 360.)

If you get a chance to play Human Revolution (the third one/reboot/prequel), definitely do so, it's very good. Came out on the 360, but plays well on Series X and PC. Had a yellow tint to everything (like the Underworld films and their blue tint). A Directors Cut came out later removing the yellow tint (though you had the option to bring it back) and integrating the DLC. Great game.

What I liked about Invisible War was, it didn't care what ending you picked in the original. It assumed you picked the Helios ending, but explains that you couldn't contain Helios, so the New Dark Age (destroy the compound) happened anyway, and the Illuminati moved in (so Illuminati ending is canon, but so are the other two). Invisible War's Helios ending is awesome and terrible at the same time. You basically invent the Borg from Star Trek. The Illuminati ending is creepy, but seems like the most reasonable. Another has all the leaders killed, and I also remember an alien invasion. In short, there are no good choices. What was cool was the rival coffee companies and what you learn if you do all of their quests. And the Britney Spears/Taylor Swift chatbot.

And the ugly? In the original, though they never come out and tell you, the human race is a couple generations from extinction as the youngest woman in the Deus Ex universe is in her late teens. There are little boys, but little girls are extinct. They've all grown up. And once the youngest one hits menopause... no more boys will be born either. Invisible War flips this around. Now the only children in the world are female. (And you can still kill children in Invisible War, just like you could in the original.) Humanity is still doomed, but we got a reprieve of maybe a decade when girls were being born who, when they got older, could be used to continue the species. Of course, neither of these things are actually canon to the world of Deus Ex. It's just technical limitations. It would be years before Skyrim would figure out you could use one body for both boys and girls, and just give girls longer hair.

Yeah, same. It sounded cool in concept. Like something in a video game. But like, what happens if you drown? Seems a real possibility. You would not be able to get insurance on your place if they knew you had that. I feel like secret tunnels in general would make liability insurance very hard to come by, or very expensive.

Is there a reason the only two options are "import pasta from Italy" and "make it yourself at home"?

Why do you think it can't be made at factories in the US? What do US factories lack that Italy has but everyone also has in their home?

Before we talk about my ignorance, clarify that point. We can't have a valid conversation with you moving the goalposts so far.

As a religiously neutral person (I don't fit with either atheists or agnostics), I like the idea of this.

There is a finite amount of information about Jesus... and a lot of speculation. There are also other books that are not part of the Bible because those who curated the Bible chose not to include them. The first five books of the New Testament for example, the Gospels of Luke, John, and the others, are the stories of Jesus, but they differ slightly due to each disciple's interpretation. You may ask why Judas didn't get a book? He wrote one. But it was not included because he was the traitor who betrayed Jesus. So he doesn't get a say. But, what if he did?

I'd like to see this chat bot be very transparent about its sources. By default it should limit itself to what is in the Bible, but it should also be possible to add other sources as well. If Christians are truly serious about the command by God to not add anything to the Bible, a Jesus chatbot should be more trustworthy than some Biblical scholar's book about Jesus. The latter is speculation while the former should only be sourced from the Bible. Sure, it might be sacrilege, but if it's done right, I think it could be an invaluable tool for priests who want to run their planned sermon — since a lot of them now are writing them on a computer anyway — by "Jesus" to have "Him" tell them if anything goes against the Bible and how they could improve it.

I'd just be curious what it says about certain controversial topics, especially if it goes against the Christian grain, and can source its reasoning with Scripture. To avoid blasphemy, it should also tell you straight up that it is not pretending to be Jesus, but rather, is only using the entire Bible (+ whatever sources you add) to help you understand what Jesus, as portrayed in those sources, would say. I imagine it would be against abortion, for example, since the act of a married het couple is an act of God and the fetus would have a soul. It would be less sure if the parents were not married, but I think it would still be against it. That said, it would probably be for immigrants and the poor. It would point out that homosexual sex is considered an unclean act, but the actual love and relationship itself is not and that a pious life would counteract that, and it could also point out that everyone sins and lives unclean lives, and that's the whole point of John 3:16. But, what do I know, I'm not a Christian. I've just read the Bible. A long time ago. But I feel like I got the message.

She's right.

I thought we were ready for a Black president, and maybe some of the country was. Where I was living at the time, a white man was okay working side by side with a Black man. He'd call him brother, they'd eat at each other's places, their wives would hang out, their kids would play together... I thought racism was mostly a memory. People were even fine with a Black boss. But when it came to a Black president, they just couldn't cope.

If these people can't see past skin colour, they definitely won't see past gender. For these people, the First Gentleman would be the "real" president. They would not respect her and, at most, would say she's just the spokesman for the real president. A lot of people liked Michelle Obama, but not because she's Michelle Obama, but because she's Mrs Barack Obama. They don't care what she thinks or knows, they just expect that she's speaking for him. And, I think, in 8 years, we saw that she was her own person, but a lot of people couldn't see it.

I wonder if she's interested in running. I think Michelle Obama would poll better than Kamala Harris. I have a feeling she's done with politics, though, if she were ever really interested.

Hillary won by 3 million votes, but that's not enough for a Democrat to be appointed the presidency by the EC. A Republican can win by 3 million (Trump 47) or lose by 3 million (Trump 45) and be appointed, but a Democrat has to win by 8 million to be appointed (Biden). Maybe not that much, but +3M apparently isn't enough.

It's an absurd system that favours the right and that's why it exists. See also gerrymandering. They cannot win openly and they know it, and they aren't even hiding it.