btaf45

Next-generation vaccines could make the flu season less of a snot-filled nightmare—if they ever reach the public, that is. Trial data out this week shows that Pfizer’s mRNA-based flu vaccine performed markedly better than a traditional shot.

On Wednesday, researchers published the results of a Phase III trial on the vaccine, funded by Pfizer, in the New England Journal of Medicine. The experimental vaccine was significantly more effective at preventing flu than a standard vaccine, the researchers found. The vaccine appears to cause slightly more side effects than others, but there’s a bigger concern: It’s uncertain whether it will be approved in the U.S., given the government’s current skepticism and fearmongering around mRNA vaccine technology.

There were noticeably fewer confirmed cases of influenza in the modRNA group compared to the control vaccine group (57 vs 87), the study showed. Overall, the modRNA vaccine was 34.5% more effective at preventing flu-like illness.

“Donald Trump and Greg Abbott played with fire, got burned -- and democracy won,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, posted on X after the Texas ruling, mentioning his Republican counterpart in Texas along with the president.

After a federal court panel struck down Republicans’ new map in Texas on Tuesday, the entire exercise holds the potential to net Democrats more winnable seats in the House instead.

“Trump may have let the genie out of the bottle,” said UCLA law professor Rick Hasen, “but he may not get the wish he’d hoped for.”

And when one party moves aggressively to draw lines to help itself win elections — also known as gerrymandering — it runs the risk of pushing its rival party to do the same.

That’s what Trump ended up doing, spurring California voters to replace their map drawn by a nonpartisan commission with one drawn by Democrats to gain five seats. If successful, the move would cancel out the action taken by Texas Republicans. California voters approved that map earlier this month, and if a Republican lawsuit fails to block it, that map giving Democrats more winnable seats will remain in effect even if Texas’ remains stalled.

There’s just money upon money, gift upon gift flowing from all the allies and all the dependents of the United States into Trump’s Washington, making many people very comfortable and some very rich.

This is not how a Republican system of government is supposed to work. As I said, the Constitution contemplated this fate and tried to forbid it. But that provision, like so many others, has just gone out the window. And it’s also illegal for the president to impose tariffs. Tariffs belong to Congress. And it’s also illegal for the president to withhold money that Congress has appropriated. The Supreme Court has ruled that the president cannot refuse to spend money that Congress appropriated. He cannot withhold the funds. He cannot pocket veto them. That’s the law—in the same way that Donald Trump cannot spend money, he cannot say, I’m taking this money from the tariffs and giving it to the farmers or whoever else I like. That’s a power of the purse; that belongs to Congress—or, at least, that’s what the Constitution says. That’s what it used to be. But, as I said, with the gifts, with the tariffs, the emoluments, all of it out the window. It’s a different kind of regime.

The theme this week is the end of the American empire. And what I mean by that is not that the United States is diminishing so very rapidly in power and wealth. But the United States has always been something more than a system based on power and wealth. It’s been an idea in the minds of people. It symbolized something. And that something has been very important and very powerful—it’s part of the power and wealth of the United States, but it’s also bigger than wealth or power.

I read the story in Axios of the government of Switzerland sending a delegation to Washington, D.C., bearing gifts for President Donald Trump: a personalized Rolex desk clock; a solid gold bar, apparently a kilogram in weight, worth $130,000, inscribed with the numbers 45 and 47, so it was the two terms of Donald Trump’s presidency, so personalized to Donald Trump, the gold bar—nice touch if you’re Swiss. And profusions of flattery and good wishes from the government of Switzerland to Donald Trump.

It paid off. Shortly afterwards, it was announced that the American tariff imposed by Donald Trump on Swiss goods would be cut from 39 percent to 15 percent.

What do the Swiss really think after they buy Donald Trump’s favor with a clock and a gold bar? Switzerland is a highly developed country with strict rules and standards of behavior. Swiss government officials do not accept gifts. They don’t take gold bars. I don’t know much about Swiss law, but I’m guessing that that would be frowned on by Swiss rules and by Swiss public opinion; they would not accept that their government accept these kinds of lavish personal presents. But in the United States, it seems to be okay. Does Switzerland respect the United States more after buying Donald Trump’s favor with a gold brick, or does it respect it less?

On Tuesday, California voters overwhelming passed Proposition 50, a statewide redistricting measure that lays the groundwork for Democrats to pick up five additional House seats. The measure was drawn up in response to similar redistricting efforts mounted by the GOP in Texas.

“If you don’t terminate the filibuster, you’ll be in bad shape,” he told them over breakfast in the State Dining Room.

It was classic Trump dominance theater, like many other occasions this year where he successfully muscled recalcitrant Republicans to confirm controversial nominees, support divisive policies and enact sweeping domestic policy legislation.

But upon returning to the Capitol, the senators made it very clear: They planned to blow Trump off. One GOP senator, Mike Rounds of South Dakota, laughed out loud when asked about the anti-filibuster push.

Welcome to the dawn of Trump’s lame duck era.

With Tuesday’s stunning election losses crystallizing the risks to downballot Republicans in 2026 and beyond, there are growing signs that lawmakers are contending with the facts of their political lives: He’ll be gone in just over three years, while they’ll still be around.

MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell delivered a scathing “Last Word” monologue Wednesday after Democrats swept key races in this week’s various elections, arguing that the Republican wipeout has left President Donald Trump “living in fear” of the 2026 midterms.