brad_troika

joined 2 years ago
[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is an article about a factory right? Not exactly the same conditions as cooking with a pan.

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm out of my element here but my understanding is that the chemicals in the FDA article are not the non stick layer, it was used in creating it and is bound to it. While I wouldn't suggest eating it (the coating) and can be harmful when heated to levels uncommon (but not impossible) in a kitchen environment there's no proof that teflon dishes can increase the chance of cancer.

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Are we reading the same article? It doesn't say it's bound to the pan. Why bother to choose a source that you don't read and disagrees with you?

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The part you quoted says nothing about cancer, article only mentions potential risks with no evidence and no article cited. I'm sorry but articles like these are why people believe chocolate cures cancer or sitting down is as bad as smoking.

I don't claim there's no connection but so far I've seen no evidence.

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

You'll find that lifetime guarantee almost always means for production errors. Not wear and tear.

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

100%. I tried stretching and massaging before and it kinda worked for me but when I stand on it it immediately stops.

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

You mean 510 million divided by 12. That's "only" 42.5.

[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] brad_troika@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

This dude is a professional sport-shooter and have been for decades.

view more: next ›