I gave a bit longer answer here: https://lemmy.world/comment/17856195
But basically postprocessing and image staking allows you to use high iso with minimal quality loss
I gave a bit longer answer here: https://lemmy.world/comment/17856195
But basically postprocessing and image staking allows you to use high iso with minimal quality loss
If you're only taking a single exposure then yes lower is better (when shooting a static scene from a tripod)
But I have taken multiple exposures and combined them in post so the noise averages out.
Also the stars move so there's only so much light I can capture and I would need to boost the exposure in post that would also then increase the noise.
As for the foreground, I was cold and didn't want to wait 8min extra so I used a bit more ISO.
The real world difference between low and higher ISO isn't as bad as it seems in the datasheet, especially when you throw postprocessing in the mix
Me neither, saw that by coincidence and had to take some pictures there
Only contrast, bright and white balance adjustments. Other than that it's a single image file.
Great to see you like my picture 😊
A pet du l sounds awesome.
This one was a wild such that was just very friendly
No in Germany, I sadly got no idea about different duck types. I only know that the ducks in the park are free.
I was only a meter away from it. The duck was very camera friendly
If your interested:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet%C5%99%C3%ADn_funicular
This is the Wikipedia article for this one
Thank you, I didn't actually see the number lol.
I just didn't see that there was a number to be honest, but there are two identical trolleys connected by a steal rope so that there weight equals out and the can easily move up the hill.
Still there was only a day difference and the same location so I found it interesting how much has changed in that time
Shure go ahead and thanks