blendan

joined 11 months ago
[–] blendan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Shure go ahead and thanks

73
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by blendan@lemmy.world to c/astrophotography@lemmy.world
 

I took 55 1min exposures at f/2.2 ISO640 with my 24mm lens. Sadly a lot of contrast is missing as the moon was out, so I hope I have another chance in the next days.

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I gave a bit longer answer here: https://lemmy.world/comment/17856195

But basically postprocessing and image staking allows you to use high iso with minimal quality loss

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

If you're only taking a single exposure then yes lower is better (when shooting a static scene from a tripod)

But I have taken multiple exposures and combined them in post so the noise averages out.

Also the stars move so there's only so much light I can capture and I would need to boost the exposure in post that would also then increase the noise.

As for the foreground, I was cold and didn't want to wait 8min extra so I used a bit more ISO.

The real world difference between low and higher ISO isn't as bad as it seems in the datasheet, especially when you throw postprocessing in the mix

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Me neither, saw that by coincidence and had to take some pictures there

 

I took 230 11s ISO1600 f/1.8 esposures and one 2min ISO600 f/1.8 for the foreground.

Both with my Nikon Z5 and Nikkor Z 24mm f/1.8 S

For post processing I used sequator and affinity photo 2

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Only contrast, bright and white balance adjustments. Other than that it's a single image file.

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Great to see you like my picture 😊

106
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by blendan@lemmy.world to c/astrophotography@lemmy.world
 

8min 400ISO f/2.8 16mm

I used my Nikon Z5 and the OG startracker (DIY startracker)

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A pet du l sounds awesome.

This one was a wild such that was just very friendly

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No in Germany, I sadly got no idea about different duck types. I only know that the ducks in the park are free.

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I was only a meter away from it. The duck was very camera friendly

 
[–] blendan@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If your interested:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet%C5%99%C3%ADn_funicular

This is the Wikipedia article for this one

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Thank you, I didn't actually see the number lol.

[–] blendan@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I just didn't see that there was a number to be honest, but there are two identical trolleys connected by a steal rope so that there weight equals out and the can easily move up the hill.

Still there was only a day difference and the same location so I found it interesting how much has changed in that time

50
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by blendan@lemmy.world to c/photography@lemmy.ml
 

 

Took a photo of a flower with my Nikon F60, Tamron 24-200mm and some Kodak Gold 200.

 

Took a 8min exposure with my Nikon D800 and my 50mm f/1.4 by night.

I find it quite interesting how the image looks almost like it's daytime, just with startrails in the background.

 

Took a 8min exposure with my Nikon D800 and my 50mm f/1.4 by night.

I find it quite interesting how the image looks almost like it's daytime, just with startrails in the background.

 
 
 

Macro Photo of some coffee beans

view more: next ›