blakestacey

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

Perhaps, one day, someone will talk about "the people that downvoted me" without sounding like a total goober. But that day is not today.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A new psychology preprint argues that "contemporary AI is research misconduct".

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago

In the Financial Times:

The hundreds of billions of dollars companies are investing in AI now account for an astonishing 40 per cent share of US GDP growth this year. And some analysts believe that estimate doesn’t fully capture the AI spend, so the real share could be even higher.

AI companies have accounted for 80 per cent of the gains in US stocks so far in 2025. That is helping to fund and drive US growth, as the AI-driven stock market draws in money from all over the world, and feeds a boom in consumer spending by the rich.

Since the wealthiest 10 per cent of the population own 85 per cent of US stocks, they enjoy the largest wealth effect when they go up. Little wonder then that the latest data shows America’s consumer economy rests largely on spending by the wealthy. The top 10 per cent of earners account for half of consumer spending, the highest share on record since the data begins.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 56 points 1 month ago

With Grok, Grokipedia aims for maximum truth through first principles and physics.

Fuck you.

Signed,

a physicist

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

zoom and enhance

By Doug Melville, Contributor.

The Forbes "contributor" hive strikes again.

To quote the most pedantic nerds on Earth (complimentary),

Most content on Forbes.com is written by contributors or "Senior Contributors" with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable. Editors show consensus for treating Forbes.com contributor articles as self-published sources, unless the article was written by a subject-matter expert. Forbes.com contributor articles should never be used for third-party claims about living persons.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago

wiki-editing weirdos (derogatory)

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago

That was actually said by some guy named Gary.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, they're already using "waffles" as a transphobic slur (irony poisoning speedrun any%), so it's really more of a question of which transphobic slurs they'll escalate to next.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I cut YouTube out of my life at the end of July and don't miss it.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

While most bullish outlooks are premised on economic reacceleration, it’s difficult to ignore the market’s reliance on AI capex. In market-pricing terms, we believe we’re closer to the seventh inning than the first, and several developments indicate we may be entering the later phases of the boom. First, AI hyperscaler free-cash-flow growth has turned negative. Second, price competition in the "monopoly-feeder businesses” seems to be accelerating. Finally, recent deal-making smacks of speculation and vendor-financing strategies of old.

https://www.morganstanley.com/pub/content/dam/mscampaign/wealth-management/wmir-assets/gic-weekly.pdf

view more: ‹ prev next ›