benvoyondon

joined 2 years ago
[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

So a speck of your projection ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Up yours derelict vacuum

[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Asinine ass kissing troll

[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

When the Lumber Industry , municipal, provincial and federal governments come together in Québec after the worst forest fires in 50 years to alleviate our carbon pollution crisis. It’s more than Irving’s playbook being forced to the masses in the maritimes. There’s a consensus in the making in “la belle province “.

https://theconversation.com/quebecs-summer-2023-wildfires-were-the-most-devastating-in-50-years-is-the-worst-yet-to-come-216933

[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You’ve never heard of fire lines to help fight forest fires in conjunction with planting trees for clear-cut forest? Forests regenerate themselves after disastrous fires. Planting trees is needed after clear- cutting a forest. But the worst is yet to come with climate changes.

[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What about a Triple Negative? You don't see triple negatives often, but here's a witty one: I cannot say that I do not disagree with you. (Comedian Groucho Marx) (If you follow it through logically, you'll find it means "I disagree with you".) There are forests and they deserve to be preserved for generations.

[–] benvoyondon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

A veterinarian walking the tight rope oblivious to his own fall in the first round. /s A nose bleed is nothing when you play with forest fires. In Québec it’s for forest management because of disproportionate forest fires due to climate change. I read the article, nothing to justify batshit crazy Québec bashing WTF!