Perhaps you can ask the author if you're interested.
arbilp3
joined 3 months ago
I agree with you about unmarked vehicles analogy, I thought the same as you.
I thought improving the satellites 'transparency' was so that scientists could more easily see what's happening beyond them. But, yeh, the video could certainly be clearer.
With what you say about satellite launches growing exponentially in the future, we need to be better informed so we can demand from our governments duty of care (am I being naive? probably). Do you know if there is any citizen organisation that looks into this? Please let us know if you do.
HIs head was sticking out. It was his little body that was being squashed. Still, they obviously didn't hurt each other.
But if it means they'll still put up thousands of satellites, even if the light the mirrors reflect is feeble they will still be harming the Earth. Death ray? Perhaps this is exactly what they want. And since when does scamming ever put off the Epstein mob and their lackeys?
Thank you, that’s very kind of you to say. The natural environment is very important to me.
And you know what? Once you take the pressure off you'll probably find more environment posts anyway 🙂
Great points you make. The terms are not clear so it would be best if you contact the Total Environment Centre and ask them directly and perhaps suggest they do some more explanation: https://www.tec.org.au/contact
What's also great is that knowing what areas are restoration opportunities and/or vulnerable, it gives neighbouring residents a chance to get together and form corridor care groups, protecting what they have and planting more trees and other vegetation to feed and shelter our beautiful wildlife.
In fact, the opposite of insane. Looking at animal images and videos, particularly of baby animals, trigger our caring and protective instincts and we sure need these in our communities an in the world.
Seems we've become a Mini-me with a veneer of civility.
Children are wise.