The real buttgrass: https://youtu.be/vs_mpXURQIo
Beauty is pain. Fashion favors the bold.
1976, chimps crack open the spring runway season with rustic grass earings, embracing eco-design.
1978, Vultures, unlikely contenders in the birdsphere, shock the fashion world by plunging themselves headfirst, literally, into colour.
Then, after four long years of (shocker) decorator crabs dominating the covers, the orcas, just when we thought the monochrome mammals had nothing new to offer, seize our fall lineup with dead salmon helmets. A statement on the cold war? On Vietnam? The rapidly decaying environment? The orcas refused to comment.
Chimps, forgotten but not forgetting, know they need to step up if they're going to make waves again. Beauty is pain. Fashion favors the bold.
Is that theyman junior developer wearing a tube sock with straps?
Good advice. Feminist Hivemind Ancillary 6969 here, and yeah, all we do is post junk history and try to be deluded.
Most of us don't give a shit who did what first and what was in their pants, I just want free tampons and less rape.
These things aren't obvious for a lot of people. The things she's studying are challenging convention. The article cites a recent move to decriminalize sex work, that lost, where these stereotypes came up.
The scientific establishment is pretty vast. I don't know what that has to do with criminology when it comes to sex work and sexual assault. I know quite a few people in STEM fields who would have problems with this article.
Depends on the thing, how much money I have, and whether I think it's worth it for the price they're charging.
Like when I don't have time to make bread I just steal it from loblaws.
I'm intrigued. Do you mean that you may experience it with five senses or that you must experience it with five senses?
Do you pay for clothes and eat them when they wear out? Do you taste and listen to household cleaners? Are silent things invisible to you, or do you use a form of echolocation?
No worries. Didn't want you to accidentally imply anything you didn't mean to.
This could be about Ubik.
Amazing! This is more than I expected, thanks for taking the time.
-
Super helpful. I have just enough chemistry know-how to understand. The resources I found were either over my head or not detailed enough, this is perfect.
-
I'm gonna try ALL the salts.
-
Good. Good to know. (oops)
-
Like if grass is the best dye but Big Green Dye doesn't want us to know. Or if there was a way to make red cabbage explode.
-
Perfect. I already have a lot of leftover cabbage. I simmer it in salty vinegar water for a dye bath anyway. (Before I add the poison.)
bonus: I'm gonna try both of these today.
Thank you!
Edit: Follow up question, if it's not too much. Do you know if there's something that makes certain dyes adhere to plant based fibres better than animal-based and vice-versa? My cabbage dyes suck for wool (even trying different mordants, including alum which, from my observation, sticks to wool and the dye stuff,) but adhere to cotton and rayon very well.
I disagree. I found it interesting on the topic of symbolism, as the author explains environmental symbolism is the lens through which he's viewing.
He's tracking a modern archetype, so the cultural references are evidence enough. Kinda like the "Cool S," some symbols don't have clear origins. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool_S
I agree it would be more interesting to know the exact thought process of the designers and track the dissemination of the image. I couldn't find anything like that, so if you have more sources, feel free to share.
Yes. I prefer boulder trends.