TheHolm

joined 2 years ago
[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago (12 children)

We already to. IMHO rego is weight based.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You managed to grow nasturtium? Probably in house. All my attempts ends same way, it got eaten by possum. It seems to be too tasty.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is there a way to check whether I sent her a message? I’m sure I did, but I can’t find it anywhere.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because aim of this low is not to protect kids, but to erase last drops of privacy in the internet. Just another brick in the wall. Kids are just collateral.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

"Australia has high population growth but also a large construction sector" largest construction sector does not translate to number of houses build. All money just going to approvals and other shit which has nothing to do with building.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And they still do not consider nuclear. 2 plants and coal is gone.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Get back to Earth, mate, we’re talking about today’s Australia. It will, for the foreseeable future, be run by cars and trucks. As I mentioned initially, bicycles are a hobby, not an essential. And so far, you haven’t provided any arguments to prove I’m wrong. So, the expectation that spending money on a hobby for a small minority, as opposed to something essential for the majority, is somehow justified, sounds strange to me

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When did I say that nobody rides? I just find it ridiculous to compare expenses on non-essential infrastructure with essential infrastructure. Non-essential infrastructure deserves only a small percentage of funding. If we were talking about something like playgrounds or bicycle paths, it would be a different story. Both are non-essential, but both make cities better. So, it becomes a matter of discussion as to which should receive more investment.

I'm not sure why you mentioned, 'All the data shows that the number one indicator of cycling rates is the quality of infrastructure.' It's obvious, but it doesn't explain why we should spend more on cycling paths."

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

If you need something which can withstand some bitrot on single drive, just use par2. As long is filesystem is readable, you can recover files even if bit of data get corrupted

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

It means you published 8080. Just stop doing it. nginx can reach that container via internal network (assuming they are on same network). Publishing docker-compose would help.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Any arguments? Discussion needs some, otherwise it just tossing shit to each other. Completely pointless, and harms both sides. Bicycles as mode of transportation is relic of the past now. We are not in Vietnam. Public transit, cars and trucks is what move this country.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Roman example is just not applicable, we are in 21th century now.

"Cars and trucks are a modern convenience, that is all". Do you really see that modern economy can function without cars and trucks? No, this is why we have to live with all their drawbacks,costs and dangers. There is simple no alternatives.

"I can get everywhere by bike, train or bus. No need for a car. I have one, but by your reasoning, my car to me is just a hobby." And what made that possible, truck and cars. When you ride your bike to shop to buy a milk, how that milk get there ? By truck.

"And what about those who cannot drive, be it for age, medical reasons, lack of income to afford a car etc?" and what about those who can't ride?

view more: ‹ prev next ›