If you mean in the instance of the rule of law yes. But the theory that the president is making is that as the head of the exec he should be able to control the exec. including independent boards and committees. So to answer the original question they will say the difference is the supreme Court is the judicial branch.
Srh
Yes but different branch of government.
They are not members of the executive branch while the ftc and nlrb board members are.
Didn't stop the founding fathers, the Vietnamese, the mujahideen etc... Resistance, is very effective. Occupation takes a lot of money and manpower, much more than the occupied need to muster. The Taliban would pay a kid to fire a mosin rifle So resistance, is very effective. American firebase then run. The base would spend way more time, money, and resources at that point trying to find who did it and stop it.
Worse, the marketing department.
They did not lose the law suit but they were going to. They settled instead. A defamation lawsuit is easy to defend against if you have not blatantly lied, but it was so clear they lied they knew they had no chance. I believe they settled for the biggest monetary settlement ever for defamation. I also believe that's why they let Tucker Carlson go.
If the post is in all it's in the public forum You don't get to have your safe space in the public forum. If you say something in public then be prepared. If you want to reach the public because of higher traffic does not mean you can tell people not to respond. I know that people will argue that it's not fair but it gives off sealioning, im not touching you vibes.
A lot of issues have become issues because companies and the government have made it impossible for good lawyers to work and make a living. Pardon the terrible but true pun A legal aids for legal aid.
My friend just became a locksmith. It has opened a lot of doors for him.
I assume they are going to be given the rank of commissar.
Don't think he did. It would be too much of a pain in the butt
Just because TLJ had new ideas does not mean they were good. And when you compare that does not stop people from trying new things. Andor is radically different Star wars. Comparing two second movies in a trilogy to each other to analyze structure is a valid comparison.
"Nothing will replicate the feelings had watching beloved movies for the first time, and expecting anything to match that is just an excuse to be dismissive of it." Expecting a movie can not match the feelings of watching a beloved movie is just an excuse not to judge it.
Also saying stop using hypotheticals when you say above "even a subpar writer could have..." Is contradictory.