PhilipTheBucket

joined 3 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ugh, that's upsetting. I have been reading Atlanta news stuff from the Atlanta bot but apparently some of it is this, I guess. My bad, thank you for information

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They could literally just have 3 interns make hundreds of fake accounts on various instances, and flood the network with low-grade but ultimately harmless content.

My guess is that it is either that, or else bribing people who have existing positions of trust on the network (admins or moderators or powerusers) to undertake some kind of destructive action.

The first is cheaper and much more effective (and won't get detected instantly), the second is more in line with reddit-exec-brained thinking. So kind of a toss-up. Something along the lines of those ideas would be my guess though. I thought about some kind of "embrace, extend, extinguish" strategy like Facebook with Threads, but I think even Reddit isn't stupid enough to try something like that (which would only result in a massive increase in the exodus of users from Reddit to Lemmy).

Edit: Well... something occurred to me. "Low-grade but ultimately harmless content" is exactly what they have been pushing Reddit towards, because they think it is better because it traps people in dopamine loops more effectively. Flooding Lemmy with that stuff (more so than it already is organically) would fuck it up from my point of view, but maybe from their point of view, something like really emotionally toxic random hatred in all directions. Maybe. Anyway, I think flooding Lemmy with content that turns people off via sockpuppet accounts is probably the easiest and most effective way, and I don't see much way to prevent it.

And crucially, his friend who owns the plant and ten more can keep cutting corners and blowing up plants and getting insurance / government bailouts for more or less as long as they want to.

That's the point.

Trump has an innate hatred for anything that can root out corruption and failure because it leads to suffering, because he thrives on corruption and failure (and for that matter on suffering). I have no idea when it stopped being a deliberate plan and simply became part of his instincts, but if he knew about these detailed fact-finding videos, he would be filled with horror and loathing on a primal level, and probably would have destroyed this agency long before it sort of happened on its own just now as part of his general mayhem.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago

I mean, there could be. The government of Illinois could make it happen, they definitely outnumber ICE right now.

Authorized representatives of the state using force to arrest members of ICE for violating specific court orders and committing acts that literally everyone can see are crimes, doesn't escalate to ICE randomly retaliating against every protestors as they've been itching to do (which is what happens if protestors start using force against ICE). Authorized representatives with a clear mandate from the people of the state, and the law, is a whole different narrative ballgame than trying to defend ourselves forcibly.

I legitimately don't understand what the holdup is about arresting them (other than not being sure their exact identities, but that can be addressed for future incidents with some advance planning). I mean that seriously. It doesn't make sense in all states or situations, but in Chicago, I actually think it does.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

190 min read

Hoo fuckin' boy

I do have to say that including Hyprland in the original post is silly. Hyprland had a problem with ignorant users making ignorant speech in their community, and they didn't police it, and once a shitstorm started, they recognized their error and started trying. It's fine. Putting them up top, and Omarchy which is literally lead-developed by an open fascist, down below, is weird.

Holy God it's a shitstorm... reading

I just want to point out there is nothing true in this statement. No such thing as far-right in current government (unless you consider anything right of your beliefs to be far-right, which is just silly), and immigration is completely fine, currently. My wife is an immigrant and non-us citizen and we have many immigrant friends. They are only deporting criminals, illegals, people who have broken the law.

Fuckin' hell man. (That quote is from nobody in particular, just some random user chiming in... but still fuckin' hell man.)

nrp's reaction in the reply chain mostly just reads like he hasn't picked up what's going on. He still thinks fascism is "a political view" instead of "an active threat that might come for him and people he cares about right now, into his house and his safety, that needs resistance." I don't think DHH needs to be in prison or anything unless he's done something. I do believe in free speech. But yes, the time has come for boycotts, strikes, marches, strengthening the organizations that we'll need as things continue to get worse. It sounds like nrp is just privileged enough living his tech life that he doesn't grasp that, and he can't understand what people are mad about here.

Nobody remembers Switzerland as unsung heroes of World War 2, because of their commitment to freedom of expression and commerce for any side without prejudice. They're lucky they got away with it, to be honest.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure there is a pretty generous window where you can just return the thing for a refund no questions asked. It might be worth looking into.

Depending on the wording of the return policy, you might even be able to request one and tell them the reason is "The far right has taken over the world's biggest government and they're snatching people in the streets. The time to hide support for them behind 'everyone's welcome to their opinion' is over. If at this moment in history you're not willing to exclude far-right people from your circle, then go fuck yourself, fuck your hardware, give me my money back, in hindsight people should have done this to BMW and IG Farben both before and after the war. I hope you wake the fuck up. You will not be safe indefinitely from them coming for you, unless people braver than yourself stop them before they reach you."

Usually I am against bullying people into saying the political views or taking the political decisions you want them to take. You can think they're wrong about this (as obviously do I, for the reasons stated above) and say so without needing to try to strong-arm them. But, in this case, fuck 'em, for the reasons stated above. Read the return policy first of course to make sure you're on solid ground, I don't really know what it is.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What's this "may" shit

How are you coming to the conclusion that they are “someone qualified”?

Someone who is trans is automatically qualified, to a certain extent, to speak about trans issues. It doesn't mean they're always right or anything, but it means they start from a baseline of being worth listening to. If you are cis and just derisively shutting them down as far as trans issues, and giving these wild insults (I can't even remember the context from the video but I remember it was bad) that have very little to do with anything they were saying, and just serve to try to tear them down and punish them so they won't try to speak up again, then yes, you're a piece of shit. To me there's not a lot of context that could somehow "save" that.

Maybe there’s more to that interaction that you clipped out of the video - i have no idea

You haven't watched it, have you...

For one of these, I actually did dig up the context. Stuff like that is important to me. So for the "I think you're choking her" clip, I dug up the context and posted it. A couple of the Hasan stans actually swore to me that the likely outcome after that clip was that he would loosen the collar and all would be well. Because of course you would. Any reasonable person would, and is Hasan not a reasonable person?

Turns out the answer was no, he did not loosen it. He blamed the issue on her NECK. MEAT. and there was an awkward silence, and then the guest who has raised the issue wisely redirected away from the looming confrontation, and just dropped the issue and went back to what she'd been talking about, as if they hadn't discovered an active issue of suffering in Hasan's favorite animal.

You know, a normal interaction and normal behavior for a pet owner.

Interesting you list Chomsky as an example because he’s made exactly the same arguments about the Ukraine war as Piker was in that video.

What? These are totally different arguments. Chomsky says, more or less:

  • The US in Iraq was far worse and more brutal than Russia in Ukraine (true)
  • Particular countries want into NATO for economic reasons, not reasons of safety (I'm not qualified to judge, I have no idea, but it sounds plausible)
  • The West doesn't actually care about Ukraine, they actually want to draw out the conflict to bleed Russia for their own reasons which increases the suffering (100% agree, I actually frequently raise this point when it comes up, I think I've said it a couple of times on Lemmy) (and also I have additional elements to add to that which come from people who know a lot about the inner workings of US diplomacy, ask me what Dan Ellsberg has to say about it.)

That all makes sense. I might agree with it or disagree but it's fine. What Hasan says is:

  • The "rest of the countries of the world" or something like that, see Russia's war in Ukraine as a strike against Western and US imperialism

That, in contrast, is a big bunch of horseshit.

Like I said, this is what I don't like about Hasan. He's just an idiot. He just says weird stuff, whatever comes to mind ("vibration collars are good for calling your dog back when she can't hear you...") but it lines up generally speaking with the geopolitical battle lines that some people like to draw, and so they support him even though a lot of times what he's saying is just nonsense. He blames world events on CIA/Mossad the instant he hears of them, he waves around his shock collar with tape over it swearing it's something else, he just kind of says stuff that's on the right performative side, and to some people that's enough.

I have no idea why you guys are taken in by this guy. You're welcome to it, I guess, but he's a pretty fucking bad standard bearer if you're looking for leftist podcast people. What happened to chapotraphouse? Behind the Bastards? I haven't seen them, I don't know... like I say I just am not involved in this space, so I have no idea who to vouch for in it, but there has to be better out there than this fucking guy.

Also, I asked you a couple times: What should I watch from Hasan to get a good idea about him? I'm going to stop asking soon, but I am genuinely curious what his supporters would want me to watch as a good introduction. If someone asked me that about James Baldwin, Noam Chomsky, whatever, I would have something that I would want to share. You are not obligated to of course I guess.

To what end?

Okay, so I'm going to take that as you're not going to try to argue with the idea that there's strong evidence that he shocked his dog and then lied about it.

I have no idea why that would not be pertinent information for you to know about this man you seem to take seriously, but it's up to you of course.

Anyone who watches this person regularly aren’t going to judge his character on the one clip

If I hang out with a friend every day, and then one day I see him punch a baby, then yes I'm going to judge his character based on that one interaction.

That's separate from the issue that literally every clip I have seen of this guy makes him look like a piece of shit in some way or another. Like I say, I actually look more at the totality of what I've seen him do while interacting with Kaya in these clips and the overall emotional interplay at work, than I do indict him specifically for shocking her and lying about it. But yes, shocking her and then lying about it (which you suddenly don't want to litigate... wonder why...) is very significant to me.

I fully acknowledged that it's probably a one-sided picture created by his enemies, and invited you to send me a clip showing the other side of his character where he's providing something insightful or valuable that I should be able to take on and make some use of, and you keep not doing it. So yeah that also makes me feel pretty settled in the conclusion about him.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, i’m looking for literally anyone you think is a good representation of your geopolitical perspective that might better inform what you consider “someone who knows what they’re talking about”.

Oh, so a different thing from someone qualified coming in and trying to help Hasan understand and him treating them as the enemy and him and all his chat going on a wild tear of insulting them and tearing them down instead of spending even a moment hearing out what they have to say.

Got it. You should have said you were interested in that totally separate question. On geopolitics I like Noam Chomsky, Rachel Maddow, Al Jazeera, Bellingcat, Tim Snyder... kind of hard to list out individual people on the spot, but those are some random ones that come to mind who deal with global issues who I generally will trust their judgement because I've seen them be right a lot in the past. Almost any perspective I can appreciate as long as it seems like it's coming from an honest place, but those are some where I actually feel pretty firmly aligned with the person's viewpoint or the overall editorial viewpoint. Then there are specific people (Dan Ellsberg, John Perkins) who have some kind of unique insight into a specific element of geopolitics that I think is valuable to include in my overall picture.

I strongly dislike the reaction slop. This stuff is that, sure, and I'm only reacting to it because they seem like they're bringing receipts, the topic is important, and the counterargument from Hasan's side is so transparently dishonest that it doesn't really convince me that he's not guilty. But I'm limited to those people for my picture of Hasan, I think, because that's the only ecosystem where he is really active and so those are the only people in a position to criticize him. That's why I asked you for some of his exemplary work on geopolitics so I can take a look at it, and judge it in the same light that I would those names I listed earlier.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're welcome to, if you would like to. I would actually really like for someone from Hasan's followers to try to explain why this post is not factually solid.

I wasn't specifically talking about you. I just noticed that the initial narrative was dew claws and airtags, and then it was vibrating collars, and now it's shifted over to 100% attacking the messenger and they're not at all interested in talking about how it's obviously an airtag collar and anyone who can't see that is stupid.

 
 

Photo: AFP Four HBCUs have gone into lockdown due to “terroristic threats” targeting the campuses, per USA Today. As of Thursday (September 11) morning, Clark University, Alabama State University, Hampton University, and Virginia State University were on lockdown after unspecified threats were made against all three HBCUs. Virginia State issued an “urgent alert” at around … Continued

 

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn, introduced a new war powers resolution on Thursday seeking to stop the Trump administration from conducting future strikes in the Caribbean after the U.S. attacked a boat leaving Venezuela last week. Text of the first congressional resolution to address the strike was shared exclusively with The Intercept.

“There was no legal justification for the Trump Administration’s military escalation in the Caribbean,” Omar said in a statement to The Intercept. “It was not self-defense or authorized by Congress. That is why I am introducing a resolution to terminate hostilities against Venezuela, and against the transnational criminal organizations that the Administration has designated as terrorists this year. All of us should agree that the separation of powers is crucial to our democracy, and that only Congress has the power to declare war.”

Congress has the “sole power to declare war” as outlined in the Constitution, though U.S. presidents often bypass this authority when carrying out international attacks. Omar, deputy chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, unveiled the resolution with the backing of CPC leaders, including caucus Chair Greg Casar, D-Texas, and caucus whip Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García, D-Ill.

Casar said Trump’s strike was illegal.

“Donald Trump cannot be allowed to drag the United States into another endless war with his reckless actions,” Casar said. “It is illegal for the president to take the country to war without consulting the people’s representatives, and Congress must vote now to stop Trump from putting us at further risk.”

The Intercept first reported on Wednesday that U.S. forces struck the boat multiple times in order to kill survivors, according to two U.S. officials granted anonymity to discuss the attacks.

News of the strike on the boat, which President Donald Trump claimed was carrying drugs from Venezuela, has divided some Republicans. Sen. Rand Paul revealed to The Intercept on Wednesday that the attack was a drone strike. A current Pentagon official denounced the strike as an attack on civilians that violated international law.

While the president is commander in chief of the U.S. military, the Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war and authorize funding. The first war powers resolution of 1973 required the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying U.S. forces abroad. Although Congress has not officially declared war since World War II, U.S. presidents have long found ways to authorize military action around the globe without Congress’s explicit permission.

The new resolution states that Congress has not declared war or enacted an authorization for use of military force against Venezuela or any transnational criminal organizations designated as terrorists since February. The measure also directs Trump to end the use of U.S. armed forces against Venezuela or any transnational criminal groups designated as terrorists without authorization by Congress.

Members of Congress in both parties have expressed concerns about Trump’s overreach in the use of military force. House Republicans are planning to advance a measure to repeal the president’s power to authorize military operations in the Middle East, as Politico and other outlets reported Tuesday. In June, after Trump ordered bombings in Iran, Democrats tried to advance a new war powers resolution which did not succeed in blocking the president’s actions. Trump has also proposed to “take over” Gaza, which the United Nations has said would violate international law.

García, the CPC whip, said the strike further exacerbated problems in a part of the world deeply damaged by U.S. interventions throughout history.

“The extrajudicial strike against a vessel in the Caribbean Sea is only the most recent of Trump’s reckless, deadly, and illegal military actions. Now, he’s lawlessly threatening a region already profoundly impacted by the destabilization of U.S. actions,” said García. “With this War Powers Resolution, we emphasize the total illegality of his action, and — consistent with overwhelming public opposition to forever war — reclaim Congress’ sole power to authorize military action.”

 

For the first time in many years, protestors were allowed to get close to delegates at this year’s Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI) arms fair in East London. Richard Hames went down to find out how attendees sleep at night.

 

Maryam walked for two hours through the streets of Gaza, reciting verses of protection from the Quran. She was hunting for a faint internet connection. Under a sky choked with smoke and dust, Maryam wound through roads converted to sprawling tent camps and long lines of children waiting for food, until she arrived at an office building where she could catch a scrap of a data signal.

There, Maryam saw a lifeline. After weeks of applying — and making dangerous trips to connect to the internet — an American university had given her a full-ride admission into its computer science program. “I was trapped in darkness, but God gifted me something to be thankful for,” Maryam said.

That feeling was short-lived. After receiving her acceptance in April, she submitted her visa application earlier this month — right after the Trump administration instructed U.S. embassies to ban most Palestinian visitor visas. These restrictions, put in place in August, apply to students, as well as those traveling to the U.S. for business, medical treatment, or to visit family. “The suspension hit hard, but I was never shocked,” she said.

Continuing her higher education in Gaza would be impossible. Israel destroyed Maryam’s university in Gaza City, where she was a fourth-year software engineering student, in October 2023. She would have deeply grieved the faculty members who were killed, but the constant news of death has numbed her emotions. “Now, I just find a strange sense of peace for those who passed,” she said.

Maryam is one of at least a few dozen Palestinian students who recently received offers and scholarships from American universities. The ban means most Palestinian visa applicants will be refused. The students interviewed by The Intercept for this piece asked to go by pseudonyms, out of fear for their safety.

“The State Department is acting in an arbitrary and capricious manner against victims of genocide by suspending these visas and not giving any context or reason for why,” said Juliette Majid, a co-founder of Student Justice Network, a group that has been helping Palestinian students apply to American universities. “Even with all of these achievements, these students are still looked at as … a threat instead of a gift.”

While the Trump administration publicly announced stopping all visitor visas for individuals from Gaza on August 16, U.S. officials were not as transparent about expanding the ban. The measure was detailed in an August 18 cable sent by the State Department to American embassies and consulates around the world. “The administration is cowardly, because they know there’s going to be pushback,” Majid said.

The State Department said in an emailed response that the Trump administration’s actions are in compliance with U.S. law. “Every visa decision is a national security decision, and the State Department is vetting and adjudicating visa decisions for PA passport holders accordingly.”

The U.S. immigration system has developed ways to exclude people for decades, from the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, to the Muslim and African travel bans and family separation policies under Biden and Trump’s presidencies. But Palestinians have often been singled out for exclusion — not only for who they are, but also because they are stateless, and therefore unprotected under international law, said Los Angeles-based immigration lawyer Ban Al-Wardi.

Even before the visa ban, Palestinians in Gaza had to overcome a bureaucratic maze of requirements while surviving a famine and relentless bombing to arrange their admission and travel to American universities. The State Department already had broad discretion to deny visas. The doctrine of consular nonreviewability means it’s typically not possible for courts to review the reasons used to deny a visa. This leaves applicants with virtually no way to challenge decisions.

The American government’s typical vetting process includes a standard nonimmigrant visa form (the DS-160) that includes basic details about family, employment, school, and criminal record. Palestinians also need to get a criminal clearance report, issued by the Israeli police, to prove they have never been arrested. They must attend an in-person interview at an American embassy. For Palestinians in Gaza, getting to the consulate in Jerusalem is difficult because of restrictions on movement, so they typically go to the embassy in Cairo. But the Rafah crossing to Egypt has been shut down.

Some students reported being asked if they ever worked for a government agency in Gaza, volunteered for UNRWA, or taught at a public school, Al-Wardi notes. The interview often includes details about their family. “It’s like an information gathering session,” Al-Wardi said. “You might not know exactly what has been going on with your uncle or cousin, but you could be accused of omitting material facts if you don’t mention them.” Some students were called back for secondary interviews and received a supplemental DS-5535 form, which digs deeper into phone numbers, addresses, and emails associated with their name. Social media accounts must be public and provided to the American government. At the American airport, students from Arab countries are often pulled aside for a secondary screening in which U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers question them and search their electronic devices, Al-Wardi notes.

The American government has built-in processes to review secondary evidence in cases where key documents are not available, but getting those can be logistically complicated too. Gaza’s postal system has also been largely destroyed over the last three years. Many students used attorneys, notary public officials, family, and friends outside Gaza to help them access important documents and facilitate the process on their behalf.

Universities typically review academic transcripts as part of their admissions process. But many students lost school records, as well as birth certificates and proof of identity, after Israel bombed their homes and universities.

DEIR AL-BALAH, GAZA - NOVEMBER 7: Civil defense teams and citizens continue search and rescue operations after an airstrike hits the building belonging to the Maslah family during the 32nd day of Israeli attacks in Deir Al-Balah, Gaza on November 7, 2023. (Photo by Ashraf Amra/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Ali, a 40-year-old living in North Gaza with his wife and three children, wants to pursue a master’s degree in nutritional science. He applied to American universities last November but lost documents that proved his identity after Israel bombed his house in late 2023. He also needed a copy of his degree certificate, but his university in Gaza had been destroyed. One of his old professors, who moved to Canada from Gaza in 2023, helped Ali get another copy of the document. While Ali waited to hear back from the school, he worked for an American humanitarian organization as a nutritional program support officer, helping to find points to distribute hot meals and providing nutritional support to internally displaced Palestinians in Gaza.

Ali was excited to learn about his acceptance into an American university but later was disheartened by the ban. “I’m so frustrated that I’m unable to think,” he said. The plan was always to return to Gaza to apply what he learned into practice. “There is no [place with a] greater need for an effective nutrition program. I came to understand the importance of this field and the need for it, especially during the war.”

Aisha, a graduate student in physics, also lost her identification documents when Israel bombed her home in late 2023. She would walk almost an hour on foot, toward the Egyptian border, hoping to connect to the internet to complete her admissions process. Aisha used to live in Gaza City with her husband and two children but has since been displaced more than 19 times. She has lived in tents, as well as on the street. During her master’s program in physics, Israel destroyed her university and killed a physics professor who had become a mentor. He had scribbled the phrase “Stay well, my physicist” in her notebook a day before he died.

Lawyers and advocacy groups in the U.S. are now limited in their ability to help. The Student Justice Network assisted dozens of Palestinian students with their university applications and connected them with educational, legal, and community resources. The Arab Resource and Organizing Center’s Project Immigration Justice for Palestinians — made up of more than 400 volunteer lawyers, paralegals, and translators— helped Palestinian Americans reunite with family members trapped in Gaza. Some attorneys with the group focused on supporting Palestinians students in Gaza, who were admitted into American universities, in the visa application process.

In the meantime, Palestinian students are no longer looking to the U.S. as a lifeline. When Aisha received an acceptance and scholarship to pursue her Ph.D. at an American university, she cried and hugged her two children tightly, whispering to them, “We will survive this genocide.” She used to spend hours looking at photos of university labs abroad, knowing that they had access to materials and resources that are banned from entering Gaza.

When Aisha learned about the visa ban, she cried with the same intensity as when she was first accepted. “My only hope is to see my children grow up in a safe world, where science and knowledge guide us toward a brighter, more peaceful future,” she said. “We are not what they say about us.”

view more: ‹ prev next ›