Peddlephile

joined 2 years ago
[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Would you believe an idiot though?

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

When it becomes really advanced (we could even do it now, actually), we replace all upper management jobs and leaving human work to human workers, e.g. customer service, healthcare, arts and culture etc.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As long as they're getting paid well to do a job they want to do and have breaks, I don't see the problem. It's a job and in this capitalist world, bills have to be paid somehow. Pretty low effort way to earn some money.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I thought that was the joke.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago
[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you familiar with the bartering system? Rather than money, you would judge the value of the object by how much you needed it. If you really wanted the avocados, you would ask the person who had avocados what they would trade. If you didn't have what they wanted, you can bargain or try someone else who has avocados who wants what you currently have.

Basically, a money less society goes back to a very simplified society. You won't be able to get everything you want and will have to, sometimes, settle for what you currently have. It also gives you the ability to trade your skills.

So, you go back to the avocado trader and tell them that you'll build an avocado shed for them in exchange for a crate of avocados. You both negotiate, exchange and then move on.

It's more work because you have seized the means of production by making things yourself in order to trade, rather than off shoring to someone else who is likely not getting paid at all. This is why the wealthy absolutely don't want this system because it's more work for them, while in the lower class it'll give more control back. When balancing, there will always be people who lose and people who gain.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, is this why they want to ban porn? "Every sperm is scared" sort of thing?

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Blue ringed octopus. Tiny but deadly.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Set up automatic bank transfers to chop your income into % parts: 5% play money, 20% savings, bills etc. do what works for you. Get rid of unnecessary subscriptions.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Welcome to the new era of enshittification where you'll eventually have to subscribe to access or make posts, and none of it will be searchable on any search engines.

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They also provide apartments to live in permanently for those displaced in the development.

Meanwhile, the US has not built high speed rail and has tent cities.

In the case of national infrastructure, China wins hands down.

Although it's kind of ridiculous to compare California with an entire country...

view more: next ›