MerryJaneDoe

joined 3 weeks ago

Right! I must have been high when I wrote that! ๐Ÿคฃ

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

See, this is why I love real conversation! Now I'm learning something! Thanks for dropping by and sharing!

Fr, I'd never heard this mentioned. It's an all new take on the purpose of (state? local?) militias, for me anyway, I've got some reading to do now....

Yeah, sorry, sometimes my ADHD just randomly throws in a clown. I mean, an entire non-sequitur sentence.

Oh, I'm so sorry, I figured that one out. The ADHD hit bad yesterday....

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

SO MUCH great information here! Bookmarked for later, so I can pick through it later and absorb all of your knowledge. Because I'm like a sponge. Or maybe more like a leech....

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's funny, I have very successful friends who used to say something similar. As one put it: "If you sell out at 20, you got no heart. If you haven't sold out by 30, you got no head."

That friend group are a great bunch of guys in their personal lives, family men and good providers, down to the last one. At the same time, they are 100% part of the problem. They are landlords and marketing execs. And every one of them has an exceptionally high EQ. (Except Jake. He's my favorite and he fixes industrial baking equipment. Used to be a bartender. You know the type - staring daggers when you interrupt his conversation with a regular customer. Jake didn't GAF about EQ.)

Anyway, it's not that they are evil. They are just the "normal" amount of selfish. They have comfortable lives. They read their newsfeeds without ever thinking any deeper. They aren't the Nazis - they are the people who empower Nazis by remaining laser-focused on their job and their family, ignoring politics unless their property tax is at stake.

I think it's possible to be a good husband and an overall good person, but not a good citizen. Zombies, if you will.

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Someone did. They missed by inches. I would imagine they beefed up security a bit since then...

And, in most cases, it's a good thing that our head of state is well-protected. Otherwise, we'd have a new president every week and the executive branch would be a mess...oh....hmmm....

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Edit: It's because I chose "Link" as the type of post. If I had chosen "Discussion", a URL wouldn't have been required.

I always do this - I ask questions first and click around later. JFC, I don't know if I've got ADHD or just come down with a case of boomeritis.


Thanks for this!

The field was marked required, with a red asterisk. I tried posting without a URL, and it did not accept the webform. Said I needed to fill in the required field.

I took a screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/gbF3jP3

(And if Imgur doesn't meet Lemmy standards, I'm happy to use a different service.)

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Totally agree with you, a handgun is no match for a tank. If the military wants to make war on citizens, they will lose.

However, there is more going on that meets the eye. Many members of the military would not want to shoot their own citizens. And armed citizens can still do more damage than unarmed citizens. In other words, the 2A forces an authoritarian administration to use violence in order to repress the citizens. It ups the stakes. And citizens can strike in ways that the military can't. Guerilla warfare tactics. They don't need to "win", they just need to disrupt, to spread fear.

But, yeah, with the current surveillance state, along with the culpability of the media, it seems a dubious proposition that armed citizens can save themselves from the fascists. Regardless, I have suddenly become a HUGE proponent of guns. Especially when I see the Black Panthers providing security for demonstrators. Respect.

 

Is it worth registering my number with the federal government (which presumably already has access to my information) to avoid spam calls? Does it work? Is there a downside?

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

This is interesting.

This memo is only relevant if Trump plans on staying in office past 2028, or installing another MAGA sycophant.

I mean, Trump knows that if a Democrat takes office, the DOJ will first clean house and then go after him for this shit. Yet he telegraphs his intention to break the law. Why?

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

The Constitution allows for the possibility of a gangster Administration. Checks and balances. The hope was that the Supreme Court and Congress would keep the executive branch in check.

The Constitution also recognizes that no system is perfect, so it adds the right to bear arms. Not for sport. Not for defense. The Second Amendment exists specifically to fight tyranny. Just in case the elections get rigged and an extremist party takes control.

Such an unlikely scenario, amiright?

[โ€“] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With respect, it's also about who receives the money.

RTX makes the Tomahawk.

In 2016, the stock was at 59. Now it's at almost 200. A return of 338%. That's about the same rate of return as the S&P 500 in the same timeframe. The difference being, the worst performing stocks in the S&P are regularly swapped out.

So, yeah, these guys are pretty much a sure bet to make money.

view more: next โ€บ