LeFantome

joined 2 years ago
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

This article is pretty good advertising for their podcast

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago

The Industrial Revolution was literally “are you truly impressed by a machine that can weave cloth as well as your grandmother”? And the answer was yes because one person could be trained to use that machine in much less time than it took to learn to weave. And they could make 10 times as much stuff in the same time.

LLMs are literally the same kind of progress.

Except we are not 200 years later when the impact on the world is obvious and not up for debate. We are in the first few years where the “machine” would be broken half the time and its work would have obvious defects.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fun fact.

Women do not produce eggs each month, they just release them.

Women are born with all the eggs they will ever have. They never make any more.

To your point, a woman may be born with around a million eggs (lifetime total). A man can produce over 100 million sperm every day.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

A legal clause that says a US corporation does not have to hold to laws passed by the US government? Good luck with that.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For what it is worth, my son was the result of the mother deciding where I would ejaculate through the use of “in the moment” physical force. So no, it was not really something I could control (though the risk of being there was my doing I understand).

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Yes. Because 10% of men is enough to impregnate all the women.

As a guy though, I wish there was male birth control. I do not love that women get to decide if they are going to make me a father or not.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Cute that you think he would negotiate

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Passing a law that is explicitly unconstitutional to end a labour dispute is pretty next level. Saying that this is a threat to democracy overall is not hyperbole. If governments think they have that kind of power with that low a bar, we are all in trouble.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is virus protection for Linux if you really want it (both free and paid).

https://www.safetydetectives.com/best-antivirus/linux/

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

There is a good chance that this guy is a bit counter-cultural and does not want to use the obvious version of anything.

Look at the Windows mail client he tried to go with.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

We have seen that a lot. It often ends with an article a lot like this.

That said, many, maybe even most Linux users started Windows users first. So, not everyone writes a snarky article and goes back.

I think a Windows user that is adventurous enough to try Linux is more likely to be pragmatic and open minded about it. They can push through basic issues like the ones raised in this article to get to the real experience underneath. Many of them like what they find enough to stick around.

But we get our fair share Linux sucks articles that are not better than this one.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

I agree that an email program is not Microsoft’s problem. However, there was a real issue there.

His point was that he knew how to easily use SSH to get around a badly behaved Linux GUI program that was monopolizing or disabling the UI. He did not know how to accomplish that on Windows.

As a Linux user, this scores points for me as it does highlight the flexibility, power, and control that Linux offers. It is also true that you have more power at the Linux command-line (even in a world with PowerShell) which is what SSH gives you access to.

That said, this article came across too much like “Windows does not work exactly like Linux and does not have all the things I love about Linux”. It also came across like a Linux expert being frustrated with a system he does not know as well.

We have had years of these kinds of articles slamming Linux when Windows people expect it to work exactly like Windows does. Those articles are dumb. We do not need to start filling the world with Linux versions of the same.

All of the stuff on this arrival is small time, first time run noise. Use it for a month and give an honest assessment of the pros and cons. What saved you time once the system was set up? What took longer? What entirely new capabilities got added to your workflow? What limitations were you just not able to overcome?

The two that I think are more systemic are OneDrive and Ads. Those are going to continue to drag on you long after the initial setup issues have faded into the background.

view more: ‹ prev next ›