Probably in some AI training data sets. Not that those are particularly good backups.
maybe they also mean Israel/Gaza or the AI push
… Gitlab though; the only difference is you see more “a large premium customer is requesting this” comments!
I love those! /s 😄 It can certainly feel like a pattern, specifically for some tickets.
I expect some hot Java code on that website 😏
YouTube recently introduced UI changes. Google probably didn't optimize for Firefox besides Chrome. Whatever they're doing, it may be more performance on Chrome than on Firefox for technical reasons.
As a quality metric, "bad company". If you can differentiate between hardware product and drivers, you can separate those metrics. But usually, and for most people, using the product also means using their drivers.
You can just take the L and say you didn’t see that the function definition that was “added” was just “removed” at the top.
That's not what happened though.
Changing the indent of the def changes the definition. That's my whole argument.
I don't get why you say "of course", agreeing with my point, but then "it was only the indentation that was changed".
Do you have a comparison to other tools like Grammarly? Were you sometimes missing suggestions or linting rules?
as an open-source alternative to Grammarly
intentionally avoids including any kind of generative AI in any part of our processing pipeline
Isn't that what Grammarly is all about, though? Be better than traditional spellchecking through LLM?
I assume Harper is entirely Rules based, then? Which inherently means limited to what rules where introduced manually and what the rules cover.
rnicrosoft.corn 🌽
New hardware manufacturer quality metric: Number of frustrated user pledges per time since market introduction.
IMO the intro “[shared] to the respective secret scanning partner” is a bit misleading because it can be read as third parties unrelated to the secret that do secret scanning. The text later on only mentions the issuer of secrets, though.