In the film, we see the ring shrink to Isildur's ring size when he hold it, and it remains that size when Dรฉagol finds it, after thousands of years without a carrier.
If you put it on a chicken, it is also gonna get really small, like chicken fingers small.
I'm not sure if this is a pro or con.
It's strange to look back at the Legend of Korra and realise it was totally fine, just worse than the original show, when comparing it to literally everything else that's come from the IP since.
I played and modded Skyrim at the wazoo back in the day too, and haven't touched it in a decade. It still holds a really special place in my heart in a worldbuilding and lore space that nothing I've played since, newer or older has sated quite as strongly, including other elderly scrolls games.
I've just started replaying it, as there is basically an entire story's worth of high quality expanded mod content to explore, plus the original game has faded to a point of re-enjoying it. I'm probably going to introduce my partner to it with my own riff on the Gate to Sovngarde modlist.
The thing is, I don't care for the next game. I have no trust in Bethesda to make something that scratches the itch that Skyrim did, I don't expect it to be moddable in the same way looking at the creation club, and I literally expect it to be an objectively boring game.
If I want more of the elder scrolls experience I fell in love with, I have it in the old games.
That's equally just because when working with adults after education, I feel like we all become so blind to age.
It's kinda accurate as we're all on different life paths, one colleague may be 19 with two kids, another may be 30 and their life revolves around Minecraft. Either is fine of course, but I just start seeing all colleges as a nebulous colleague age.
I'm 95% sure it isn't, I've obsessed over that game for years and this makes no sense to me.
Edit: It's the wizard of Oz
TLDR: I think AI is coming for teaching (for better or worse), but not coming to replace us, because the teacher:student ratio is already as poor as can be.
I'm a teacher. Giving a serious answer, AI is likely going to be very involved in this industry over the next decade, purely for it's ability to track and scaffold individual learning better than one adult doing the same for 30 people, but that would require a shift to even more digital learning, which takes the "how" of teaching out of the hands of a teacher in a way it currently is not.
That said, I don't actually think it's coming for my job precisely because there is 1 teacher to every 30 students. If you compare us to how cashiers have been replaced by self service tills, teachers have already been stripped to a minimal coverage of the classroom, and you cannot have 30 students independently working, because children and teenagers are predominantly motivated to avoid working. I'm this regard, it can only supplement our job, as they can't meaningfully cut the adult to student ratio further for safety reasons.
Also, although I think it'll start to be seen in the next 10 years, I'm not sure where it would come in. State schools do not have the budget, energy or time to experiment with individualised AI learning support, and private schools prefer to maintain older styles of teaching for a long time, as they prioritise the development of attitude and trust over academic scores as not only does it supplement academic scores, but it is what the corporate employers of privately educated students seek above merit.
Funnily enough I actually have Firefox open by default whenever I boot up my PC.
I have no taskbar or desktop items. I always default to a specific workflow of pressing the windows key (or whatever we call it for Linux), and searching for everything. I have since early windows 10.
I realised that 90% of the time, I was opening Firefox, so now it just opens. I have a pretty minimal toolbar setup for it, so it's basically just an address bar that automatically focuses when I start typing.
One day I'll set up something where I have multiple search hotkeys for web search, file search, application search, music etc, that will sort of replace this.
China aren't strictly speaking allies. They get a lot of oil from Iran and have plenty of deals in place, to the point that many people believe that the Venezuela coup and Iran war are a US ploy to destabilise China specifically.
China basically stay out of geopolitics far more than people assume. They are very unlikely to enter the Iran war on either side, ever.
27 here, back to university too for similar reasons and seeing the same thing.
I don't actually blame the lecturers or teachers. A huge part of higher education is self motivated learning with access to people who are incredibly knowledgeable, who also happen to be your teachers / lecturers.any lectures are there to guide the topics of independent learning.
Until a certain point, the purpose of most education was education itself. The matter half of the 20th century into today has seen a shift of the purpose of university being for employment on the other side. This is an enormous difference, it no longer appeals only to people who are passionate about the subject. If 70% of the lecture theatre is there not to learn but graduate, it changes the learning itself. People by nature want to optimise their tasks to get their goal; if the goal is to be as educated on the subject as possible, then you're motivated across the board. If the goal is to get a job and the degree is a checkbox in the process, or even if you're going because "that's what you do", then the motivation is to pass. There is no bare minimum to learning, there is to graduating.
The goalposts move on difficulty too. Universities are for-profit companies, who sell qualifications. Inevitably the difficulty of the qualification will creep downwards, as the expectation of difficulty from the learner does the same.
I think this has been happening for long enough that in all but the most prestigious or passionate corners of higher education, the staff and teachers also first entered higher education in establishments where everyone was motivated by either employment or profit.
Don't get me wrong, I do believe plenty of people in higher education are motivated by education for the sake of it, but it's no longer the default expectation.
I'm guilty of using LLMs from time to time, and more guilty of finding it gradually replacing what I used to Google search.
If it's something that Wikipedia can help me with, that's still my first port of call, but gradually, for anything problem solving related, I just ask an LLM.
Even a year or two ago, I was googling things with reliable websites for advice at the end, like reddit, but clearly that has decayed as a reputable source for support.
Googling things that require more than just knowledge is difficult now, and asking the sometimes wrong machine is consistently more useful.
I'm guilty of using LLMs from time to time, and more guilty of finding it gradually replacing what I used to Google search.
If it's something that Wikipedia can help me with, that's still my first port of call, but gradually, for anything problem solving related, I just ask an LLM.
Even a year or two ago, I was googling things with reliable websites for advice at the end, like reddit, but clearly that has decayed as a reputable source for support.
Googling things that require more than just knowledge is difficult now, and asking the sometimes wrong machine is consistently more useful.
I would consider myself a Lord of the Rings fan, I've read the books maybe 3 times through and read The Silmarillion once.
I forgot the ring makes people invisible.