Khrux

I'm close to a similar point, my PC has been Linux for a couple of years but my old surface book has been on windows 10 (with some 6 year security update thing that was mentioned during the time Win 10 was dropped).

The main reason I haven't dropped it is that I sometimes use it for work or uni, so compatibility and other people being familiar has been a priority but I've graduated and got a work laptop so it's probably time to drop Windows outright.

I'm actually pretty lukewarm on the Witcher franchise. I've read all but the most recent book, tried the show for 2 seasons, and played all the games. As much as people hype this franchise as some sort of rival to A Song of Ice and Fire or Lord of the Rings, it absolutely falls short.

That said, the Witcher 3 specifically deserves all the love it gets. I actually boycotted it for a few years after release because the graphic downgrade it had after the early gameplay trailers came at a time of extreme manipulation of this sort from other studios, but eventually picked it up with both DLC in a sale, approaching it with a lot of cynicism.

Not only does Hearts of Stone tell what I'd consider the best witcher story, Blood and Wine is a fantastic post-game to the franchise in its vibrant pageantry romp through a riviera; it's just a happy environment to end Geralt's story in.

I would consider myself a Lord of the Rings fan, I've read the books maybe 3 times through and read The Silmarillion once.

I forgot the ring makes people invisible.

I did hear a point about general game dev trends which is how optimisation wasn't really a step in older games like it is now. When confined to the MB scale, or even just the finite scale of a single disc, the process wasn't one of bloat and then half-arsed optimization but hyper optimised from the get go. I don't think this shift is entirely the performance budget of modern games, but the multi-platform, limitless upper end, no disc limit design of modern games.

In the film, we see the ring shrink to Isildur's ring size when he hold it, and it remains that size when Déagol finds it, after thousands of years without a carrier.

If you put it on a chicken, it is also gonna get really small, like chicken fingers small.

I'm not sure if this is a pro or con.

I forgot Gemini was an LLM and thought this was hate for people born May 21st - June 21st, that they are dumb due to trepanning.

Don't worry, they make them look like people as a silly game, we'll be chased down the street by drones.

It's strange to look back at the Legend of Korra and realise it was totally fine, just worse than the original show, when comparing it to literally everything else that's come from the IP since.

I played and modded Skyrim at the wazoo back in the day too, and haven't touched it in a decade. It still holds a really special place in my heart in a worldbuilding and lore space that nothing I've played since, newer or older has sated quite as strongly, including other elderly scrolls games.

I've just started replaying it, as there is basically an entire story's worth of high quality expanded mod content to explore, plus the original game has faded to a point of re-enjoying it. I'm probably going to introduce my partner to it with my own riff on the Gate to Sovngarde modlist.

The thing is, I don't care for the next game. I have no trust in Bethesda to make something that scratches the itch that Skyrim did, I don't expect it to be moddable in the same way looking at the creation club, and I literally expect it to be an objectively boring game.

If I want more of the elder scrolls experience I fell in love with, I have it in the old games.

That's equally just because when working with adults after education, I feel like we all become so blind to age.

It's kinda accurate as we're all on different life paths, one colleague may be 19 with two kids, another may be 30 and their life revolves around Minecraft. Either is fine of course, but I just start seeing all colleges as a nebulous colleague age.

I'm 95% sure it isn't, I've obsessed over that game for years and this makes no sense to me.

Edit: It's the wizard of Oz

TLDR: I think AI is coming for teaching (for better or worse), but not coming to replace us, because the teacher:student ratio is already as poor as can be.

I'm a teacher. Giving a serious answer, AI is likely going to be very involved in this industry over the next decade, purely for it's ability to track and scaffold individual learning better than one adult doing the same for 30 people, but that would require a shift to even more digital learning, which takes the "how" of teaching out of the hands of a teacher in a way it currently is not.

That said, I don't actually think it's coming for my job precisely because there is 1 teacher to every 30 students. If you compare us to how cashiers have been replaced by self service tills, teachers have already been stripped to a minimal coverage of the classroom, and you cannot have 30 students independently working, because children and teenagers are predominantly motivated to avoid working. I'm this regard, it can only supplement our job, as they can't meaningfully cut the adult to student ratio further for safety reasons.

Also, although I think it'll start to be seen in the next 10 years, I'm not sure where it would come in. State schools do not have the budget, energy or time to experiment with individualised AI learning support, and private schools prefer to maintain older styles of teaching for a long time, as they prioritise the development of attitude and trust over academic scores as not only does it supplement academic scores, but it is what the corporate employers of privately educated students seek above merit.