Slow, expensive, riddeled with corruption, long ago surpassed by renewables. Why should we use it?
Maybe you should read up on the topic and not just repeat baseless falsehoods.
That would be so nice...
Propagandist propagandizes.
More news at 11
It wasn't even an accident, he just killed a cyclist because he wanted to drive on a bicycle path without being, rightfully, called out for it. Bonus points for having his child in his car.
Some critics argue that the prestige of the Prize in Economic Sciences derives in part from its association with the Nobel Prizes, an association that has often been a source of controversy. Among them is the Swedish human rights lawyer Peter Nobel, a great-grandnephew of Alfred Nobel.[40]
Nobel accuses the awarding institution of misusing his family's name, and states that no member of the Nobel family has ever had the intention of establishing a prize in economics.[41] He explained that "Nobel despised people who cared more about profits than society's well-being", saying that "There is nothing to indicate that he would have wanted such a prize", and that the association with the Nobel prizes is "a PR coup by economists to improve their reputation".[40]
Wer mit gendern die AFD wählt, wählt auch ohne gendern die AFD...
Critisicing Israel is not antisemitism.
Yeah, and thats the reason why you are a "conservative".
"Conservatives" are usually right wing extremists, thats the same everywhere.
Yes, but energy density doesn't matter for most applications and the waste it produces is highly problematic.