I'm in favour of maximum ratios of total compensation. Stock values, dividends, salary are all added together to get a total compensation value.
Start it at something like 50-1, then gradually lower it as the actual workforce is allowed to control an increased share of the company.
There is still incentive for growth; the growth is simply distributed more equitably.
So:
A loan of $1 m is given to Mr. Richbitch McDouchebag based on owning $1 m worth of stock.
Eventually that loan has to be paid off.
When McDouchebag sells off some stock to pay the loan, the amount paid presumably enters a bank account, either in their name or in the name of a numbered company they control, yes?
That's income. Apply tax to it before they pay off the loan. In Canada, the top marginal tax rate is 33%, so $330k minus the other marginal tax amounts for the lower brackets would be applied before this money can go to pay off a portion of that $1 million loaned.
It's either this, or we rip up the income tax act alongside finding a different revenue stream for the government.
I'm for whatever we can get on board with most people, because I am pretty sure most of us who aren't accountants hate filing income taxes.
If we instead got most of our money from other things that the government sold, then (a) big companies couldn't use the same accounting tricks to hide income, as we would no longer be taxing those precious profits of theirs (b) the rest of us wouldn't have to go through tax pain every April.
I realize that for some people, they get things like tax credits for a bunch of things like home renos, etc.
Perhaps under a no income tax system, the incentive to do these activities that reduced their income tax would have to be changed to something more tangible, like a guaranteed lower rate on utilities or something. I dunno.
Statistically, this applies to all other forms of gambling as well. The house almost always wins.
Just the blue states, please. We'll give them Alberta and Saskatchewan as a trade. (joking, of course. We need the potash, and probably the oil as well).
At this point, I think a better term for both the US and Canada would be 'post-industrialized', rather than 'highly developed'. Honestly, we are both sliding backwards in terms of human development.
He was a carpenter...
My positive vision of masculinity is using your power to protect the vulnerable, rather than punching down at them. As others have said, that is what Aragorn did.
Ku Klux Kanucks double down. More at 11.
What's the official punishment for treason again? Used to be summary execution way back when, but I believe we eliminated the death penalty in 1976.
Edit: Just looked it up. 25 years. Ehh, better than nothing if it could stick.
Good news. I hope Canada gets there, but I doubt we will. We are too focused on oil expansion and infrastructure to pay any mind to the 'dirty poors' right now.
If we had kept Petro Canada as a crown corporation past the 1980s, we could be funding UBI NOW, but of course, conservatives fucked that up.