Golly gee, dev. I know you're providing a completely free service and ads barely cover provided services, but go ahead and add these extra features that will raise costs further.
It's free! What the hell? ๐
Golly gee, dev. I know you're providing a completely free service and ads barely cover provided services, but go ahead and add these extra features that will raise costs further.
It's free! What the hell? ๐
It will be back when it's back.
Ew. Why would you want to add something that encourages hate?
ALL generators on the site use the same AI plugin for text, which means all of them are using the same exact same model.
The dev is NOT using any of the output from the text gen for training data. Nobody does that. It's literally the worst thing you can do to an AI model and will cause it to degrade rapidly.
As I understand it (please, correct me if I'm wrong), aren't gallery posts global? From what little I know, a named gallery (default is "public") can be any name. That name becomes the identifier for that gallery. This means that anyone may use that same name and access that gallery from their own generator. If they're public like that, how would this removal power work. Since you would affectively have the right to remove gallery images that don't actually belong to the generator?
Well, I did see an em-dash in there...
Anyway, I do understand the sentiment. It's not very fun being left in the dark, especially when we're not even given a chance to participate.
That's a strange question from someone with a "legal background", especially since this is readily available information.
What you are suggesting is something called an "editor phase", some COT (chain of thought, commonly known as "thinking" models) do this to an extent. It's also something that can be done via JavaScript in the current AAC right now. To do this in AAC, you can either fork the current chat and make your own changes, or you can leverage the JavaScript function on characters to have the AI respond twice. Once to perform a standard completion, and the next, passing the entire chat again, this time including the last response along with instructions on what to "edit". The AI makes a new response, and you replace the last response with the modified one. AI isn't actually capable of self-analysis or of thinking about what its going to do as its responding, so to help mitigate this issue, you must break things into steps.
AI is stateless, which means it's seeing everything for the first time every time it responds. Writing instructions, characters, lore, reminders, your response, chat history, all of it is just sent as a big block of text with little header text for each section. The AI then has to parse through all of it, try to make sense of it, and then come up with a response to send back to you. What you're asking for is just another block of text to send along with everything else. Really no different than a reminder.
This is a simple limitation of the current AI model and it will improve (probably by a fairly good amount) with the text upgrade, but it still won't be perfect because AI doesn't actually understand.
You're providing the AI with information that sounds like China, which means the AI is going to look at the data it, see stuff that sounds like China, and that stuff is related to China, so it's going to talk about China.
If you're wanting another character, why not just add another character? Make a character, then add them to the chat. Use System for system things.