FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why are you being condescending?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I don't know how to give more context than what is already present in your comment I replied to...?

edit: oh wow you changed your comment completely

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

no, I implied that they are not

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

or achieved unsuccessfully?

i cant decide

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

...i don't believe you.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

hahah, least deluded Trump voter

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago

in tab completion I trust...

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

well, since the voting is public it's easy to remove your votes and block your instance after the fact

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

I've learned today kbin and mbin exposes it to users too

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

hmm, how would the receiving instance verify? what happens if I send 100 random hashes?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

That would be great. I'm not sure how to solve the problems that arises though. If i can send an anonymous vote to an instance, what stops me from sending 100?
Maybe there's some smart cryptographical solution here that alludes me, but it seems hard, if possible.

view more: ‹ prev next ›