Evil_Shrubbery

joined 2 years ago
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Not the way he eats it.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

... and some of them have social anxiety ...

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

... have the Feds not bombed a private residence for a long time?

I know of 1985 but I'm sure this is a more regular occurrence.

There must be a list, but I can't find it on Wiki.

(To clarify if unclear, the explosives used in this case was to damage the door, not to bring down the building.)

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's prob necessary to do something, even new ICE vehicles & new fuels are not the cleanest in India, but old ones prob really need to go, especially in a country with such pollution problems.

How to achieve that & why not boost public (city) transport instead, etc & why they decided to go this way can def be questioned - but that's in all nations & at the end something still gets done.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not driving in baseball sized hail. in my book that IS an emergency.

Never said anything against that.
Just pointing out that if that was true, you would stop by the side of the road anywhere, not seek an overpass & drive to there in 'emergency conditions'.

Bcs this is what this post is all about.
Ppl stopping where they shouldn't & in conditions they would just drive on if there was no overpass.

You wrote:

is full fuck off to another overpass

Why would you fuck off to another overpass if the conditions are dangerous?
If it was an emergency you would stop asap.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I thought the exact same thing!!

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

^ historically/statistically there must have been a sailor serving in some navy with the nickname Moonshine.

But also just for fun:

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was almost OK with the plot, they (re-)set-up the story fairly nicely, for a moment it had potential.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Except if the crime was done against the rich/powerful, then it all gets done in 3 years or much less, including the media outcry and even finding a scapegoat if need be.

The system is designed to not waste resources on non-rich vs non-rich crimes whilst also providing an additional option for when the rich are the perpetrators (in case it gets that far).

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28431423

The theorem has been expressed colloquially as "you can't comb a hairy ball flat without creating a cowlick" or "you can't comb the hair on a coconut".

 
 

... someone linked this in a Discord server and it's just too horrible not to repost.

Would have turned the switches the other way around tho.

view more: next ›