Devial

And who gets to decide who gets killed ? Who is infallible, incorruptible and flawless enough to decide who gets executed ?

And if you cannot name them, then tell me: How many innocent people are you willing to murder, per 100 executions. If you cannot name a flawless judge, then innocents will be executed. That is a fact. So tell me: How many innocents are you willing to murder, for heinous criminals to be executed instead of getting life without parole ?

This dude was literally currently at trial for murder. That argument might apply AFTER someone has been wrongly acquitted.

This logic is literally NEVER applicable inside a court room, before the verdict has been read.

So you're saying the victim of a crime should get to act as judge jury and executioner ?

Like I'm sorry you had to go through that, but how would you feel it your child was falsely accused of murder, and then revenge killed by a family member of a victim at trial.

There's a reason we don't allow vigilante justice.

Ah yes. Classic "Everyone deserves a fair trial, until I think they've done a bad enough crime, in which case I'll activately cheer for that right being taken away".

Vigilante justice is NEVER acceptable. Until someone has been justly tried, and convicted they innocent in the eyes of the law. Period, and no exception.

You people cheering this on, and encouraging have on your hands the blood of every single innocent person who was ever killed or assaulted by a vigilante.

Again, you're completely free in your choice to use economy classe. Business class and upper class ticket prices are in the same price range today (adj. for inflation) as the tickets of old times flights.

You're literally complaining about an option, that is entirely optional, existing, and not being as good as the more expensive ones.

Women may not not be a mathematical minority, but they absolutely are a cultural/societal minoritiy.

Cultural minorities have nothing to do with the absolute number of members the group has, but how much political and social power and influence the group holds.

That's why black africans during apartheid Africa would still be considered minorities, even though they made up the mathematical majority of inhabitants.

No, the topic is the UK electric code not being safe.

You're literally arguing that merely BECUSE the code needs safety devices it is therefore unsafe, which is utter nonsense.

By this logic, a potato is the best in terms of electrical safety. That's of course tongue in cheek, but if we're reducing plug capabilities in the interest of calling them safe, USB-A 1.0 is the "safest" because it only outputs 5V at 3A.

I'm concerned that you thought that was legitimately some kind of good point you made there. The fact that we're talking about a household plug and socket is blindingly obvious from context.

SN441011 is the Swiss system that through its 2-, 3- and 5-pin design supports single- and three-phase for up to 11 kW in domestic applications.

I have literally never in my life thought for even a millisecond "hey wouldn't be useful if I could plug my regular appliances into a high power outlet too ?"

How many multiphase and high power outlets do you people have that needing to be forward compatible with regular single phase household plugs is relevant ?

There's like maybe 2 or 3 devices in a home that even need multiphase high power outlets, like ovens+ranges, electric driers or water heaters or EVSE. And none of those tend to move around much.

Also, again, as I literally stated in in comment of above, that is a matter of convenience , not safety, so it's an irrelevant point.

Putting the onus of electrical safety on the user for repairs with a screwdriver is, in my opinion, inherently unsafe, especially when there's no safe backup through a circuit breaker. Imagine an impatient user replaces a burnt fuse with a piece of aluminum foil.

What if someone does that to a car fuse ? What if someone does it one of those old circuit fuses that you still get in old buildings without breakers ?

Or imagine an impatient home owner duck tapes their breaker/GFCI to "ON" because they can't be arsed to find the fault that makes it trip every 20 seconds.

Idiots ignoring obvious safety instructions will make most ANY system unsafe. It's not like replaying a fuse is a hard or dangerous process. Most plugs allow you to just clip out the fuse holder with anything small and pointy, swap it with an equal, and then pop it back in. It's not like we're expecting people to do rocket surgery here.

And here we are again. For the billionth fucking time in a row:

THE CURRENT CAPACITY OF A CIRCUIT HAS ZERO, NADA, NULL INFLUENCE ON THAT CIRCUITS ELECTRIC SHOCK POTENTIAL OR SEVERERTY AND IS NOT RELEVANT WHATSOEVER FOR HUMAN SAFETY.

And device safety is MORE THAN adequately provided by fused plugs. You just irrationally hate the UK network for some fucking reason, and are yet completely incapable of providing even a singular valid argument as to it being less safe.

You can get pretty much all of things today. You just have to pay the same price you did back then, adjusted for inflation.

In the old days every single seat on airplane was basically business/first class. There was no such thing as economy.

Passengers wanted cheaper tickets, so the clas system was introduced to offer cheap economy seats, and now y'all complaining that the seats specifically invented to be as cheap as possible don't offer the same amenities as the expensive ones.

Unless they're mandated by code, I don't care. Basic safety being an optional add on by the manufacturer is bad.

Nothing in this thread is about fatphobia. Literally nothing.

It's simply about the fact that society can't bend around every body type in existence. And yes, that sucks unbelievably much for people who ARE untypical bodytypes, and yes it's enormously unfair but it's more or less the best for a shit situation.

It's unreasonable and impossible to expect everything in every circumstance, to be accommodating to every possible body type , at least not without having having a massive number of seats on every transport empty, because they're reserved for people of unusual bodytypes, who are rare and therefore rarely use them. That would make prices higher for everyone, it would require more planes and busses an trains to be built and moved to accomodate the much lower number of effectively usable seats, which will lead to even higher costs, the networks will grid lock under the increased traffic, and the environment will suffer from all the extra airplanes that are now transporting far fewer pax per flight than before.