Clam_Cathedral

joined 3 years ago
[–] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Similar thought to your first paragraph, now that the dust is settling. My best guess is the current US playbook is to risk most of the US soft power and take advantage of its current economic position to really bolster its hard power so the US is in a position to exert more direct force/coerce the rest of the world for what it wants and have more control over policy in other countries. If that's really the case then china is probably the biggest threat to that gamble as it's been catching up to or surpassing the US in a few industries recently. And if the gamble fails the economy sinks for a while and Europe or china passes the us as the global powerhouse.

[–] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

A better angle might be that currently in the US capitalism is rarely actually scrutinized for the disadvantages it does have. Capitalism is almost synonymous with America and people often see critiques of capitalism as an attack on the nation itself, even though most of them don't actually know the principles or characteristics of capitalism.

It goes the other way too where people automatically think that characteristics of America are capitalist

As an example a majority of Americans probably think that American politics and democracy is part of capitalism, or that the economy is pure capitalism.

If people were more willing to critically evaluate capitalism without feeling attacked it could increase support for more worker friendly policies that are generally socialist in nature while still having a capitalistic foundation.

[–] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago

If I had to make business sense of this, it might be a pilot for eventual functions like a "sentiment injection" tool to really sway public opinion. With enough halfway believable accounts, not only does the site look more active, but companies/advertisers could pay Facebook to have the bots shovel opinions and products to users in a more overwhelming and coordinated approach than is currently possible with external bots.

[–] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So maybe it's not actually the DEI itself that makes the game bad but actually the shitty game design and writing that makes the game bad and lore suck.

[–] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

You are quite dug in on the presidential election, but do keep in mind you are usually also voting for local/county positions on that same ballot, where one vote often makes the difference and has a more immediate impact on your interests

[–] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, what monitoring in this context means is to be made aware of each other's porn INTAKE, or how much is being consumed and when, which the software is said to do. Nothing is suggesting they seek porn out to share content with each other, just that they are alerted when the other accesses porn.

I'd bet youre right about the alternative devices though.