Breezy

joined 2 years ago
[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

I currently have a GitHub account in order to contribute to projects hosted on GitHub, because I don't think there is currently a way possible to do thinks like open up an issue without an account.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 84 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I really wish more FOSS projects would move off of GitHub. It feels wrong just having an account just so I can contribute. Hopefully horrible "features" like this encourages others to migrate.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A handful of alt accounts of course, and me: beep boop, hello fellow human

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 weeks ago

While I still see a lot of people scrolling through traditional social media while I'm out and about, it does feel like more people are starting to disconnect (which I think is a good thing) even among my younger friends and family.

I still browse Reddit every now and then, especially for the more niche subreddits, but I don't have an account nor do I plan on making one. I've definitely noticed a lot of low-effort comments that makes Reddit look more active, but the substance really isn't there. So while a similar (if not the same) post here on Lemmy would have less or no comments, it substantially feels the same to me.

Despite the fact that I'm usually a lurker and don't have much to add to most of the posts here, I've recently been making more of an effort to be more active here on Lemmy to combat this. But honestly, as someone who hasn't had a proper social media account for over a decade now, I actually prefer a more empty internet vs one filled with nonsense.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, what Vittelius mentioned is correct, it's more that I don't like how most Electron apps on Linux look due to the lack of CSD, causing that flat shadowless look in the screenshot with VS Code next to Dolphin. So, if anything here's to hoping more devs will test their Electron apps on Linux Desktop Environments/windowing systems to make their apps look more native in these environments. But I do appreciate the clarification on SSD, it's nice for me to finally learn the terminology used to describe why I find most Electron apps on Linux to look janky.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Ah I think I might be misunderstanding then.

For this:

Many popular apps, including Visual Studio Code, Obsidian, and Discord, use frameless windows with custom title bars. Prior to Electron 41, frameless windows did not support CSD at all, so they looked like featureless rectangles on Wayland.

Am I misinterpreting that Electron on Wayland now supporting CSD for frameless windows would make it possible for developers currently using them to better mimic the look of Qt or Gtk apps (with shadows and rounded corners, etc.)?

I'm using KDE Plasma and Electron apps sometimes have that sharp-cornered, shadowless window vs the way Qt or Gtk apps are rendered. The most noticeable difference for me is the lack of outline, rounded corners, or shadow.

But do correct me if I'm wrong since I don't know much about Electron development.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago

First it's the ethernet in the air filter, and now this. I wonder what's next lol

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

It''s neat to learn about CSD. That flat frameless window with a custom title bar look is what I dislike the most about electron applications. Hopefully those become less apparent with these new updates.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago

Omg, this is embarrassing, I just realized my dyslexia strikes again. I read that as ports and not expose. That's nice, I rarely ever see that being used. Thank you for the explanation.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

First, thank you for AI disclosure. Second, thank you for auto-filling the credentials for the demo. That small attention to detail is always a green-flag for me. I also had a great laugh at Rich's timeline in the demo.

There was actually another CRM-like self-hosted software that I had written down to check out called Nametag, but the last time I looked at it, it didn't have CardDav support, so I wonder how this would compare.

I am curious why you've exposed the backend port by default for the Docker Compose file. Is this for future external API access or just to ping the healthcheck thru something like Uptime Kuma? Why not just put both the frontend and backend in a network (I do already see the frontend having a depends_on dependency? I guess my assumption would be if the frontend is down, so would the back.

But this looks really neat, thank you for sharing! The next time I get some free-time I'll spin up a little test instance for a deeper dive.

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago

And I get it, I do, but I think what rubs me the wrong way is how cagey the dev is about AI disclosure.

Use it for your project, it's open source (which allows me to see that AI is being used) and free to self-host. Like I mentioned previously, I do see the dev being pretty responsible about their usage from the few merge requests and individual commits I looked at.

Personally, I feel like FOSS is built on a foundation of trust, and I find it very hard to trust a dev/project that (in my opinion) lies by omission. So, while I won't use/contribute/pay for this project, I'm not judging anyone who does and I wish y'all the best. At the end of the day, it's your time, effort, money (if you donate and or pay for the hosted plan), and or hardware (if you choose to self-host).

Especially, after fiascos like Booklore (another project I now feel vindicated for writing off early) and the general trend of enshittification for almost all software and services, can you blame people for being a bit more skeptical?

[–] Breezy@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I feel like I'm going crazy, because I distinctly remember checking out this project a couple of years ago (before they were called Linkwarden, and then when they renamed it) and noticing all the ai-looking commits (especially after the rename) in the repo so I wrote off the project. Also notice how OP doesn't deny that they're using it, just says he started the project before ChatGPT. I went through his profile and the AI profile picture and https://github.com/daniel31x13/gstack fork are pretty telling.

Let's be honest, a lot of FOSS projects have been inundated with ai pull requests, and I looked at some that were merged. At least the dev looks like they're being responsible about them. Look at the contributors for the last 6 months, claude is right there: https://github.com/linkwarden/linkwarden/commit/8bd3bd376316332693c5074a59dc3ab03559f1dc. Look at that contributor's profile and website. For another one: https://github.com/linkwarden/linkwarden/pull/1553. Look at that user's GitHub profile, look at the activity, look at his website. I'm not saying he's not a good programmer or anything like that, but be for real, he's absolutely using AI for his code, if not an ai agent of some sort.

I also find it hard to believe an app that features ai tagging wouldn't also use ai. So it seems disingenuous to tag their Reddit post with "No AI" in r/selfhosted.

At the end of the day, I'm not personally invested, and they're free to use ai in their project (it is a tool after all and can be used responsibly). But I'm really developing trust issues with how dodgy some projects are about disclosing their AI usage. Like just say you use it to debug, qa, brainstorm, or write your docs, and or that the outputs are actually reviewed by a person.

 

Here are some empties I've collected and my thoughts on them! I've also included some of my thoughts on products I didn't have the mind to take a picture of and those I've given up on.

For reference:

  • Skin type: Dry, Sensitive
  • Season & climate: Hot, humid, and the only season is summer (and maybe one week of fall every now and then)
  • All prices will be in USD.

Empties

Starting from top to bottom, left to right:

Curel Intensive Moisture Care Deep Moisture Spray

It's a decent fragrance-free spray that hydrates well. This is actually my second of three 150g bottles that I had purchased in Japan from a Don Quijote a couple of months back. I can't remember the exact price, but I want to say it was around $12 or less. It serves its purpose with no fuss, and I enjoy the fine mist that the spray produces.

Product: 3.8/5, decent, inoffensive, does its job.

Packaging: 4/5, produces a fine mist without jamming, not too wasteful in terms of excess packaging, and comes in a nice 150g aluminum (almost like spray paint) can.

Price: ~$12 from Don Quijote, relatively economical for the amount of product you get

I already have and have opened another bottle, but after I use this last bottle up, I'm not so sure. Recently, I've been using the SkinSmart hypochlorous acid spray instead, and, while the spray isn't as nice, I find that it works just as well. Maybe I'll miss it once I use it up, and I'm not opposed to repurchasing it if convenient.

Would I repurchase? Maybe.

Aestura Atobarrier 365 Cream

I actually really enjoyed this fragrance and dye-free cream, but some major drawbacks for me are how ridiculously shimmery it makes my skin look and its gritty texture. It's moisturizing and nourishing without feeling too heavy, but I really hate how it makes my skin look.

I'm not even too offended by the texture because you can simply melt the "hydrating capsules" in between your hands before applying, but man I hate the shine. I understand the trend of "chok chok" and glass skin, but it was just way too much for me. I'm not even sure what causes it to be so shiny. After looking at the ingredients, I expected there to be mica or something similar, but there isn't.

It's just a shame, this could've been a decent product for me. One of the creams I can use without mixing as a final step for my dry skin.

Product: 2.9/5, it could've been so nice if it weren't so dang shiny and if it didn't have a gritty texture.

Packaging: 4/5, no nonsense 80ml tube with a flip-top.

Price: $20.57 from YesStyle (purchased back in Feb. of this year)

For $20 at it was already iffy on price for me, but now that I'm looking up prices today I see it ranging from $26 to $40 which lands it right into over-priced territory for me. Couple that with my drawbacks, I can't say I'll miss this product.

Would I repurchase? No.

CeraVe Skin Renewing Eye Cream

On recommendation from Dr. Dray a dermatologist that's on YouTube. It's fragrance and dye-free and does its job. It's nourishing and gives me a temporary effect of not looking so dead, which lasts for a little less than an hour or so until you feel the moisturizing effect dry up.

Product: 3.5/5, it's nourishing and provides a temporary awake look to my eyes.

Packaging: 3.8/5, no nonsense 15ml tube with a screw cap. Can sometimes be difficult to screw open when you've some product on your hands (which I usually do once I get to the eye cream step in my routine).

Price: $23.53 at Target

While this product is a bit pricey, I like the effect enough to justify repurchasing it. I do see you can get it cheaper on Amazon though, so maybe I'll buy it from there next time.

Would I repurchase? Yes, I'm already on another tube.

Melano CC Essence

This is the product that got me into believing in vitamin C and is the only product with fragrance that I still use. It doesn't seem to be enough to irritate me, and the scent itself is a slight/mild citrus-y smell.

It just provides a nice brightening effect and I don't have to keep it in the fridge. This product will discolor over time, but the last three tubes I've used up haven't had that issue (but, if you can actually see it oxidize around the cap if you find some excess product around). I'm not sure what the vitamin C percentage in this product is, as it's not listed, but it's enough to cause your skin to flush if you use a niacinamide product like Holy Snail's Shark Sauce too close with it.

Product: 3.9/5, it gives me a temporary brightening effect next day and relatively calming.

Packaging: 3.8/5, no nonsense 20ml tube with a screw cap and an interesting dropper spout. Can sometimes be difficult to screw open when you've some product on your hands.

Price: Sub $10 from Don Quijote, can't remember the exact price, but it's pretty inexpensive.

I thought I had already purchased a few in Japan earlier this year, but I must've given them to some friends, as I can't find anymore. I may use this opportunity to try out Geek & Gorgeous C-Glow, although I'm still undecided, since I don't care to store products in the fridge (as they recommend). I'm heading back to Asia next month, so I'll just stock up some tubes there.

Would I repurchase? Yes, planning on it.

Neutrogena Hydro Boost Gel-Cream with Hyaluronic Acid for Extra-Dry Skin (pre-2023 reformulation)

Fragrance and dye-free gel moisturizer that does its job. It's not moisturizing enough alone for my dry skin, but I enjoy the light-weight texture and the hydration it provides. I usually mix in something nourishing like Geek & Gorgeous Happier Barrier cream to compensate.

Product: 3.5/5, it's nice and light-weight, people with normal to oily skin could probably use this alone, but it's definitely not enough for dry (or its claimed extra-dry) skin.

Packaging: 1/5, I hate jars so much >:(

Price: Around $10 each, purchased in a two-pack from Costco.

I've read online that this product was recently reformulated, and for the worst. My mom has stocked up on enough from Costco where this isn't a problem for me since I can just go over steal from her stash. That said, while I like this product, I'm not inspired to personally repurchase, especially not with its new formula. I'll use up what I have for now and continue my search for the perfect moisturizer.

Would I repurchase? No, I have enough backups.

Kose Softymo Speedy Cleansing Oil

Fragrance and dye-free light-weight oil cleanser that washes off cleanly. Does a good job removing sunscreen and make up.

Product: 4/5, no nonsense, works, and doesn't leave any residue.

Packaging: 3.9/5, a 230ml pump bottle that comes with a plastic stopper, so you can sort of travel with it.

Price: I think it was under $10 purchased from Don Quijote.

Simple, effective, inexpensive. I have no desire to look for another oil cleanser.

Would I repurchase? Yes, I'm already using another bottle.

Hada Labo Gokujyun Premium Hyaluronic Milk

Fragrance and dye-free emulsion that could be nourishing enough to serve as the final step for those of you with oilier skin. My dry ass needs more, but this serves as a nice nourishing addition to my skin care routine. Helps that the product contains urea as well, though that's not a major selling point for me.

Product: 4.1/5, no nonsense moisture.

Packaging: 3.7/5, a 140ml bottle with a flip top cap that can get quite messy if you don't take care to clean it after each use. Also, when you get low on product it can sometimes be too easier to over-dispense product.

Price: I think it was around $12 or $15 purchased from Don Quijote.

Even though I mix this with Curel Moisture Facial Milk (Intensive Moisture Care), if I could only choose one, I'd go with the Hada Labo product.

Would I repurchase? Yes, I'm already using another bottle.

Skin Aqua UV Super Moisture Gel Gold SPF50+ PA++++

Not pictured, I already threw away the old bottle before I thought to make this post.

I recently went back to this sunscreen after it felt like my face was lit on fire by La-Roche-Posay Anthelios UVMune 400 Hydrating Cream SPF50+ after I got over-zealous with my tret. I'm not quite sure what that sunscreen was reacting with, since I immediately washed it off and slapped on good ole reliable Skin Aqua with no burning or stinging.

Overall, the texture of this sunscreen is a slightly viscous fluid that sets with a slight sheen and no cast. I've walked and hiked with this in tropical climates and it stayed on even through sweat (though I still re-apply).

I've actually used both this and the regular formulation (the one in the white bottle with the gold cap), and they both work well. I prefer the gold one only because it's slightly more nourishing than the regular one but I wouldn't mind using either.

Product: 4.2/5, it's the one I keep going back to.

Packaging: 4/5, a 110g bottle with a narrow spout.

Price: Around $12 or $15 purchased from Don Quijote.

Rhoto got me in their grips.

Would I repurchase? Yes, I'm already using another bottle.

Given Up On

The Inkey List

I'm going to lump all the products I've tried from this brand into one because my opinion on all of them is mostly the same.

The products I've tried were incredibly underwhelming. While the products were fragrance-free, they all had moderate scents that irritated me. While it may seem economical at first, each individual product appears to be travel size. I didn't go in with high-expectations and I was still let down.

Products I've tried:

  • Omega Water Cream -- Felt like a more emollient toner; relegated to foot cream.
  • Retinol Serum -- Felt like the Omega Water Cream; relegated to foot cream.
  • The Tired Eyes Duo -- Felt like a slightly more nourishing Omega Water Cream for both products; tossed.
  • PHA Toner -- Did nothing for me, water-like consistency; I prefer Geek & Gorgeous Calm Down; tossed.

Would I repurchase? No, and I won't purchase from this brand in the future.

Aestura Atobarrier 365 Cream Mist

Had the same issues as the cream: made my face look incredibly shiny. The product itself is fine, a moisturizing type of mist, but I can't overlook the shine. It also didn't help that the packaging cracked at the bottom about a month in, leaking almost half the product.

Product: 2.5/5, actually moisturizing, but I hate the shine.

Packaging: 1/5, cracked in a month; the mist itself is actually really nice and fine.

Price: $15.60 from YesStyle (purchased back in Feb. of this year)

Would I repurchase? No.

view more: next ›