0x0

joined 2 years ago
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. The explanation is that prohibition makes markets. If you're gonna risk getting caught you might as well hype your shit and turn a higher profit.

Otherwise there'd barely be adulterated weed.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably one instance is blocking the other. Yay freedom.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Posted the source i found it through.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No for-profit will bother with security unless forced to, as it's seen as an expense and shareholders don't like that.

Edit: also:

We had difficulty identifying the right disclosure contact for this issue. We did not want to contact FlyCASS first as it appeared to be operated only by one person and we did not want to alarm them.

Emphasis mine.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I get that simple text doesn't convey as much as images or speech, but, ...i find myself having to add the /s (but it's easier to ignore the downvotes).

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You're following the Technology community?

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That’s why I’d love to see more developers take another look at Linux.

I'd love to see more developers taking a look at writing portable cross-platform code.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

The ghost of Steve Jobs is in the machine.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It needs to belong to the people or it can never be trusted

Damn commies!

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, yet another case of Just because you can doesn't mean you should.

view more: ‹ prev next ›