this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
19 points (85.2% liked)

Socialism

5762 readers
54 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stalin was initially receptive to Lenin’s New Economic Policy. I’m not familiar with the whys & whos of its retirement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always assumed the serial crises and upheaval of WW2 and the Cold War put experimental policies like that on the back burner and they just never got picked back up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's been my understanding as well, the NEP was abandoned because there was a realization that the USSR would not be able to withstand a war with Germany without rapid mass industrialization.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And the state of emergency was very hard to lift after given that the US got all the Nazis to work on sabotage against the Eastern bloc, not to mention had developed a nuclear weapon and refused to rule out a first strike against the USSR.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Exactly, USSR was under siege from western capitalist powers throughout its whole existence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The reality is that Deng Xiaoping was a classical Marxist so he wanted China to follow the development path of classical Marxism (grasping the large, letting go of the small) and not the revision of Marxism by Stalin (nationalizing everything), because Marxian theory is about formulating a scientific theory of socioeconomic development, so if they want to develop as rapidly as possible they needed to adhere more closely to Marxian economics.

  • lemmygrad user recently