Pretty easy when all of their phone passcodes are “1488”
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
119 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
1208 readers
18 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
They also claim to have "revealed an additional grave, previously unknown security breach at the highest levels in Washington." Though the article does not divulge details.
Not really. Context:
As such, the reporting has revealed an additional grave, previously unknown security breach at the highest levels in Washington. Hostile intelligence services could use this publicly available data to hack the communications of those affected by installing spyware on their devices. It is thus conceivable that foreign agents were privy to the Signal chat group in which Gabbard, Waltz and Hegseth discussed a military strike.
They are referring to this reporting as having "revealed an additional grave, previously unknown security breach".
Ah, my bad. I misread it.
The wording in the article was not the best, easy mistake to make.
So if you were a journalist and 'stumbled' upon this data, which would it be: expose the leak as a scandal, or compromise the accounts and milk them for continuous leads and inside info?
Highest levels…hmm 🤔