this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025

14 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Science

9941 readers

28 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.

Community Rules

Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.

Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.

Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.

Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.

Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.

Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.

Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.

Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.

Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.

Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.

Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.

Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.

Rule 7: Report violations.

Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.

Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.

Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.

Rule 9: Source required for answers.

Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.

By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[Biology] Are there terrestrial animals with largely elastic skeletal systems? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not a biologist, but if I understand your question correctly, you are basically looking for land-based invertebrates that also lack a hardened exoskeleton (like insects). This would basically consist of small, soft animals like snails, slugs, leeches, tardigrades, and tons of different types of worms.

The reason that you don't see large examples of this in land-dwelling creatures is that skeletons or exoskeletons become way more necessary without a medium like the water in the ocean to help support a body. The rigid structure provides an attachment point for musculature to create the mechanical levers we use to manipulate our limbs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

You've understood it right! I wasn't thinking of invertebrates as I was really curious if there might be something strange in-between, but given the other replies here mentioning the same, I think invertebrates may be the closest known of currently.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Are worms like fish in that they're not really a specific category of animal? More like an umbrella term or a broad classification?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you please elaborate on your question? What do you mean by an elastic skeletal system?

Can you give an example, even if fictional?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sort of like you see in cartoons, a terrestrial animal that could be "squished" without breaking any bones and goes back to their non-squished state. It's something I think is more observable in aquatic life, like say octopuses that can squeeze themselves into small spaces.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While there may be examples of what you are thinking of, I think the most common solution developed by evolution is invertebrates without an exoskeleton, meaning no skeletal structure at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The whole point of having bones is their rigidity. Animals that don’t require a rigid structure, simply have no bones, chitin, exoskeleton or shell.

As others have pointed out, there are plenty of squishy terrestrial animals, but they don’t have flexible bones or any bones for that matter. Those that do have bones, also have cartilage, and there are many sea creatures that rely almost exclusively on it. However, I can’t think of a single terrestrial animal that would be composed of cartilage to that extent. I guess gravity opposes such ambitions, and weeds out anyone who tries to pull off a build like that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks to you & @[email protected] for your replies. Not sure why but this curiosity was lingering in mind so I thought I'd put the question out there in case there might be some really unique example of such an organism.

I guess it'd have to be a very unique environment to drive such an adaptation, which would be fascinating in itself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Biology is full of strange exceptions. As soon as you think you’ve figured out a rule that applies to something, you’ll find some obscure creature that violates that rule just to piss you off.