Whenever someone justifies a position with common sense you can safely take it as supported with zero evidence. If they had it, they'd give it.
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
219 points (99.5% liked)
Fairvote Canada
588 readers
90 users here now
What is This Group is About?
De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?
The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.
🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.
Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.
🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.
- A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems
- What is First-Past-The-Post (FPTP)?
- What is Proportional Representation (PR)?
- What is a Citizens’ Assembly?
- Why Referendums Aren't Necessary
- The 219 Corrupt MPs Who Voted Against Advancing Electoral Reform
Related Communities/Communautés Associées
Resources/Ressources
Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles
- List of Canadian friends of Democracy Bluesky
- Fair Vote Canada: Bluesky
- Fair Voting BC: Bluesky
- Charter Challenge for Fair Voting: Bluesky
- Electoral Renewal Canada: Bluesky
- Vote16: Bluesky
- Longest Ballot Committee: Bluesky
- ~~Make Votes Equal / Make Seats Match Votes~~
- Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (IRV for municipal elections)
We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.
Politiques de modération de contenu
Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
see "the DARE program works. i know it works because it's obvious it works"
meanwhile in evidence and reality, the DARE program the opposite of works
What are you talking about? The DARE program worked great.
I know it worked great because I was told it worked great. If it hadn't worked, then why did it exist and why did so many people pay so much money into it?!?1?
slashsarcasm
Not directly DARE, but pretty close.
Good point, this is why we must all be against common sense gun laws in America.
The effective number of parties in Canada is currently 2.76 and declining - a trend that threatens democratic diversity. Unless we implement proportional representation, we're likely heading toward a two-party system that will further constrain political discourse and representation.
Only Green🟢/NDP🟧 consistently support proportional representation.
Now is the time to be getting information from Canadian Owned and Operated media.
There will be disinformation campaigns unlike any other election.
"Common sense" is what you are forced to use when you don't know what you're doing. Falling back on common sense is FAILURE.
Common sense is such a ridiculous way to discuss politics. By saying something is "common sense" you are automatically putting down anyone that disagrees with you. You are discrediting their position immediately.
There is no compromise or discussion when you bring in the phrase "common sense."
Good question related to common sense
“Common sense” is an outdated modernist concept.
They've debauched the terms Patriot, Heritage, Freedom, Liberty, and now Common Sense.
There’s no “common sense”. Half the population don’t have “common sense”.
It's like "pioneer spirit" - Americans proudly think we inherited it, but most of us couldn't pioneer our way out of a Walmart.