MorphMoe

489 readers

5 users here now

Anthropomorphized everyday objects etc. If it exists, someone has turned it into an anime-girl-or-guy.

Posts must feature "morphmoe". Meaning non-sentient things turned into people.
No nudity. Lewd art is fine, but mark it NSFW.
If posting a more suggestive piece, or one with simply a lot of skin, consider still marking it NSFW.
Include a link to the artist in post body, if you can.
AI Generated content is not allowed.
Positivity only. No shitting on the art, the artists, or the fans of the art/artist.
Finally, all rules of the parent instance still apply, of course.

SauceNao can be used to effectively reverse search the creator of a piece, if you do not know it.

You may also leave the post body blanks or mention @[email protected], in which case the bot will attempt to find and provide the source in a comment.

Find other anime communities which may interest you: Here

Other "moe" communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

PostgreSQL Girl (by GTSWorld) (ani.social)

submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

src

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Does writing the name and Icon on a animegirl make it count as MorphMoe?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Artist tagged it with 擬人化 (gijinka), which means personification. Here is example of just text+girl, but it still has tag 'personification'.

Everyone has their own view, this particular author presented PostgreSQL as a girl with suspenders for very short shorts (like if they were elephant's ears or smth), maybe it's not as unusual as, for example this one, but I think it fits well enough to be here. Maybe it depends on the person, and so I shouldn't post something like this too often (or mb at all). I don't know much about art, so I just trusted the author's tags, as I mentioned earlier. Thank you for your observation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

To be clear, my comment was less meant to criticize you and more to spark a discussion.

For me this image don't really count as MorphMoe, but I don't speak for this community as a whole and the upvotes show that there are people thinking otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I would say that image is not look like anime — rather 3d model. So MorphMoe for you is something less casual, like humanization animals or fantastic creatures. For example, that picture fits better than that? Cz for me they are the same (u know, like in the meme).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I would say that image is not look like anime — rather 3d model.

Right. I'm sometime just a bit lazy to write out the fitting term.

So MorphMoe for you is something less casual

I personally prioritize the morph aspect. So the main characteristics and general structure of the source-object are kept and applied to a anthropomorphic body.

For example, that picture fits better than that

For me, it does.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

She doesn't even have tusks, smh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

::: spoiler deleted by creator ~~You are right. You clearly understand more about art than I do, moderator-sensei.~~