Sad for the environment, happy it's destroying russia
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)
Ukraine
9722 readers
336 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The fuel was going to end up burned anyway, so it's only bad for the environment in that it's incomplete combustion with lots of soot. It's also preventing other fuel getting processed, so it could be a net benefit.
Didn't think of this, that's nice! Burn baby
Burn baby burn.
We don't need no water, let the motherfucker burn...