so it's not actually addressing any of the issues that this sub has? Just a technicality?
196
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
the whole point is that qaz is better qualified to adress any issues that may arise
What issues exactly?
Not enough people posting? Lol
Do you not know why almost everyone left? Are you out of the loop?
I just come on Lemmy once or twice a day to see what people are up to, I'm still not entirely sure what 196 means but I enjoy the dank maymays of the youth, I'm not in the loop on drama alas
dabs
Pretend I am ootl
A few months ago one of the Mods had a power trip, decided to move the community to .world, the Community disagreed and moved to:
Does this mean you're not going to randomly ban people who disagree with you anymore? I hope so, but at least we have [email protected] if that continues to happen.
I banned Stamets a couple times over the last year for posting an anti-trans meme and a different instance of not tagging NSFW. Stamets is a repeat offender, hence the ban from Moss. Banning people for not tagging NSFW is in the stated rules. Repeat offenders are held to a higher standard. The "trolling" tag was because they plainly refused to tag the post.
I might buy that for Stamets but not necessarily for the other people who commented in that thread. Some of those people had very illegitimate bans indeed.
It's in the modlog, you don't need to take my word for it.
We have an email people can reach out to. We all have access to it so we can keep each other accountable. If anyone feels that they've been unfairly banned, they can reach out to the email and a mod unrelated to the ban will address it. We've let go of a mod in the past for unfairly banning people, it's not like we're going to defend each other for no reason. We're a team, sure, but my justice-flavored autism isn't going to hold that relationship over doing the right thing.
this.
o7
Awe :(
Thank you for your service