this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8840 readers
867 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Both of those sound kinda dystopian. Because you just know the first one will start getting gamed by every company from the grocery companies trying to SEO the AI, to the big fossil fuel companies trying to get you to drive your car more.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is making a picture of me as an astronaut "dystopian"?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The same technology can be used for widespread, low-cost, highly convincing misinformation and propaganda campaigns

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

The moon landing wasn't faked, but I was there instead of Neil Armstrong. See these pics?

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You don't need "AI" for that. All you would need is some standardized APIs for the various shops, and you could easily solve this with computer technology from 20 years ago.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

All you would need is some standardized APIs for the various shops

Stores: "I'm going to stop you right there"

[–] kamiheku@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The reality is, though, that there are no such APIs. LLMs on the other hand could be a valid tool for the use case.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not that there's no API. It's that there's probably a different API for every single grocery store. And they make random changes and don't have public documentation. That's why we need the AI.

[–] kamiheku@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Yup, exactly, no standardized APIs.

[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And it's a service because AI

And the service costs a subscription fee

And the service quality drops once it saturates the market

And the service now contains ads

And the grocery stores can pay to promote their store when it is not the most affordable option

And now it's not economically feasible to not use their service

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

The cheapest way to get groceries in the States has always been do all your grocery shopping in the same store, preferably a discount store like an Aldi, instead of cutting coupons and going to multiple different stores due to the simple fact that the gasoline used for driving around is most likely going to cancel out any saving from shopping around, an unfortunate side effect of America's car centric infrastructure.

You don't really need an AI to make this list, plus, I think there are apps that already trying to do exactly that.

However, getting a computer to draw yourself in ridiculous situations (usually with an equally ridiculous number of fingers) is great entertainment.