wait, but what about off-by-39-or-51 errors?
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
148 points (98.1% liked)
xkcd
10125 readers
101 users here now
A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
And the off-by-41-or-49 errors.
In this language you would account for this behavior so all comparisons and lookups would be designed to be valid for the increased range. To do this you'd have to record integers in increments of 10, so there would be no (or very few) off-by-40-to-50 errors, or off-by-1 errors, but there would be off-by-10 errors.
but therewill be occurences when you add/subtract the same number when writing and reading an int, so it is not entirely eliminated
Welp, guess it's time for:
for(float i = 0.0; ....) {...}