The previous screen:
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
633 points (98.8% liked)
memes
18528 readers
3871 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Red vs blue was ahead of its time
I've got bad news for you, this wasn't from RvB.
Your statement is still true independent of the image, however.
Didja ever wonder why we're here?
I, for one, am here because one faithful day, u/spez decided to restrict API access to third party Reddit clients, but don't let this distract you from the fact that in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table.
It's one of life's great mysteries, isn't it?
if this isn't a proposition it's none of your business
and if it is I'm not interested
if this isn’t a proposition it’s none of your business
and if it is I’m not interested
I dunno... if the slide-deck was made from scratch just for me bc the person is too socially awkward to know how to "normally" proposition me... I'd at least complete it.
I wish I knew the date and context of this. With words like "gay" and "woman" being censored out by the U.S. administration, I imagine that official government surveys might end up looking this stupid now.
I also imagine the possibilty that some biased group is attempting to inaccurately count the number of participants that are/aren't straight. If they put choices like "gay" or "bisexual" or "asexual" (if it's even included) on a second page (after clicking "More options"), they're creating friction for pretty much anyone who isn't "straight." That is, not everyone will bother going through another option page - they may settle for "Prefer not to answer" because it's already right there in front of them. Then when totaling up the answers at the end, whoever's using these data can simply omit the respondents that didn't answer. Boom - just like that, it will appear as if a greater percentage of the group are straight. Such easy LGBTQ-erasure.
I see Epic at the bottom of the screen, so this is in some kind of healthcare setting (Epic is an electronic medical record software company).
Comment was from here (nov 2018): https://aroace-people-are-lgtbq.tumblr.com/post/180804138659/ah-yes-the-sexualities-straight-confused-i
Orientation? Forward...
Front Towards Enemy
Reminds me of a copy of a gender selection form, where someone was probably overwhelmed by long words like "heterosexual" (6 syllables!), and wrote "straight" at the "other" option.
"More options" sounds very bisexual to me.
Just kidding. Good luck in this dystopian hell, people
- presses "more oprions"*
"I SEXUALLY IDENTIFY AS A A-10 WARTHOG! ALL HAIL THE BRRRRRRRRRRRRRT!"