this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7687 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Viruses had only been discovered a few decades before this picture was taken. It's very likely that the family (and most of society) had no understanding that the virus was unlikely to jump species and so took the same precaution to keep the cat from spreading the disease that they themselves took. I'd rather people made this sort of mistake than the willful idiots we had this time around refusing to believe in viruses at all.

[–] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that cat just has white fur on its face, that’s not a mask

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I understand why everyone sees a mask, but I don’t think it is one either. You can see too much detail on the nose, I wouldn’t expect to see that much unless it was a very sheer fabric used for the mask.

[–] WanakaTree@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Ah you're right. Make more sense, I was thinking how the FUCK did they get a mask on that cat??

[–] GroteStreet@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Or maybe they just thought it'd make a cute, silly family photo