this is an icky issue because lemmy sends votes with empty addressing, so remote instances should count them but not show them to anyone. however mastodon (and *key) sends likes with empty addressing too, but considers them public. lemmy is (surprisingly) right here and should request that the rest of fedi respects the protocol and hides stuff based on its addressing. maybe open issues on mastodon and friendica

also this issue probably exists when seeing lemmy posts on any microblogging instance

[–] kazaika@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know this name, I read its part of the Fediverse... Does this affect us?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 6 points 10 months ago

Yes, it is probably the oldest or second oldest server suite in the fediverse (diaspora is maybe older).

It was an early supporter of statusnet and pump.io, which are the earlier versions of ActivityPub.

It originally used it's own protocol to talk to other friendica instances, but a lot of plug-ins came out adding support for everything, even Facebook support for a while.

[–] Saltycracker@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wish friendica had a mobile app. I spend more time on my phone

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Its webui is responsive (i think), its compatible with the mastodon api.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There are some instances that disable downvotes altogether!

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

That's pretty cool. Sometimes in an argument there's that (1/-1) thing going on, would be funny to see how both are downvoting each other.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I was thinking just now how there seems to be people who downvotes threads for no apparent reason, even seemingly innocuous and neutral ones.. for example "Kingdom Come has sold 2 million units" 3 downvotes; "This New Algorithm for Sorting Books Is Close to Perfection" 5 downvotes; you get the idea. Now everyone is entitled to their opinion, but It makes me wonder if someone(s) is spam downvoting for some motive.

[–] Overwrite7445@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

My guess is accidentally hitting the button while scrolling, and too lazy to change it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (9 children)

The first isn't really interesting, and the second is clickbait. I wouldn't say there is no reason for downvoting them.

load more comments (9 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments