Open Source

36179 readers

174 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

384

Codeberg is currently suffering from hate campaigns due to far-right forces (blog.codeberg.org)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32660327

(page 2) 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Codeberg seems to be down atm. I hope they aren't under an even bigger attack

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that’s just you, it works fine for me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Hmm, might be. Up again now anyways, lasted for ~5 minutes

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

How can we help?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This kind of gave me a rally around the flag effect so I left a 10 USD donation.

I was thinking about building an explicitly socialist project on there so I hope it will compensate for maybe risking increasing said far-right attention in the future.

[+] [email protected] -66 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Is the term "far-right" used to mean anyone who doesn't obey marching orders and won't conform to opinions of others?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dude, do you think a group that hates "diversity" in its every shape and form is just "moderate"?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as diversity if nobody is allowed to reject what you believe in, reject your opinions, a la "diverse opinions and beliefs".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Believing that certain groups must be eradicated isn't covered under my tolerance of "diverse opinions".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By your logic, you must show respect and acceptance to libertarians or anyone who follows religious teachings if they are not trying to punch or shoot anyone. Other than that, that's what criminal law is for, to protect everyone from execution or assassination, but rejecting people, refusing to associate certain types of people because they find certain kind of people disgusting does not equate to planning mass murder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think one should also show acceptance of highly defamatory speech, and only punish the very people that act out on them?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Publicly banning opinions and beliefs is the fastest way to lead to murder and physical violence. Most commonly, murdering those that have been banned for not conforming. But if you can find other areas of personal interests and enjoyment to build friendships with people who disagree with your opinions, the collective whole is not so hostile.

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments