Typescript is delightful to ensure that everything works and you don't get surprises. Tailwind though...
...it's certainly faster in the development but it's not nearly as nice as CSS can be, especially since now any browser supports nesting.
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
39 points (93.3% liked)
Programming Circlejerk
299 readers
1 users here now
Community to talk about enlightened programming takes
Rules:
- read and follow the programming.dev code of conduct
- no flamewars
- mark your unjerks
- only programming related content allowed
- link to the original source
- do not mention this community in places like hackernews, lobste.rs, or the general programming communities on Lemmy where we source jerk material from.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
idk if nesting is the reason people used tailwind. imo it's more that css itself is a lot of complexity and overhead to write if you already have nesting and reuse in whatever you're using to produce html, ex react. I'd rather not have to maintain a css tree and a component tree when it can all be colocated.
writing raw html? yeah tw doesn't make any sense
Well, I meant the opposite - in CSS you can make the styles cleaner with nesting and such. TW always ends up with a ton of copy-pasting.
Though I will be fair, I don't think the projects I've seen it in used the themes properly.
if you're copypasting you're not using the code reuse tools of your component library. the nesting in normal css is component nesting with tailwind. and if you're copypasting things that aren't just the same component styles but something else shared, it's just a string you can stick it in a variable.
uploaded image instead of just the link because linkedin sucks
Fuck typescript, fuck tailwind, fuck this idiot.
I like TW and TS but I also agree with your passionate hatred for hipster siloing.
Typescript has made the js ecosystem better.
Tailwind is the epitome of someone trying to make one tool that does everything then tries to sell you on buying only that one tool. As the old saying goes: When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Sure you can hammer a screw into a wall, but if you used the right tool for the job to begin with, you could also unscrew the screw and replace it later without needing to fill the old hole or make another hole in the wall.
Tailwind exists purely because developers keep trying to learn CSS the wrong way from people who don't know how to use it, then get frustrated when it doesn't work out.
The problem is that when you're starting out, you don't know the difference between good and bad teachers.
You can say this about literally everything.
...no? I have heard (or made) plenty of complaints about various languages from people who know and/or use them professionally.
I don't really understand your comment. I meant the statement in the image.
The statement is "only developers who have never used them or aren't skilled with them dislike them or prefer [the primary alternative]". Is that what you mean could be applied to "literally everything"?
Yes
Okay, so I'm saying that there are lots of languages for which that's not true, i.e. people who use the language do dislike them.
Every single person?
I think you might just be misreading the original post. It could be rephrased as: "all developers who dislike TypeScript and Tailwind either haven't used them or aren't skilled with them." If you could say that about anything, it would mean that developers never dislike tools with which they are skilled. I'm saying that's clearly not the case.
Ohhhhh
I'm not agreeing with the person in the image. I'm saying something like "people say that about everything" or "for every language thete is someone in the world who will say that for the language."
Not "this is true for every language"
So...I'm not sure what that implies about the statement? "Someone probably believes X about Y" isn't just true for any Y, it's true for any X.
Why use many lib when few lib do trick? *shrug*
The bigger your node_modules, the more right you are.
jerk style violation 😉
modding you right this second