this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45678 readers
2289 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada will be the first nation to start printing warnings directly onto individual cigarettes in a bid to deter young people from starting smoking and encourage others to quit.

The warnings, which will be in English and French, will include phrases like "Cigarettes cause cancer" and "Poison in every puff".

The new regulations go into effect on Tuesday.

Starting next year, Canadians will begin to see the new warning labels.

By July 2024 manufacturers will have to ensure the warnings are on all king-size cigarettes sold, and by April 2025 all regular-size cigarettes and little cigars with tipping paper and tubes must include the warnings.

The phrases will appear by the filter, including warnings about harming children, damaging organs and causing impotence and leukaemia.

In May, Health Canada said the new regulations "will make it virtually impossible to avoid health warnings" on tobacco products.

A second set of six phrases is expected to be printed on cigarettes in 2026.

The move is part of Canada's effort to reduce tobacco use to less than 5% by 2035 and follows a 75-day public consultation period that was launched last year.

Canada has required the printing of warning labels on cigarette packages since 1989 and in 2000 the country adopted pictorial warning requirements for tobacco product packages.

Health Canada said it plans to expand on warnings by printing additional warning labels inside the packages themselves, and introducing a new external warning messages.

Dr Robert Schwartz, of the University of Toronto, told BBC News it was good news that Canada was "moving forward with this innovation".

"Health warnings on individual cigarettes will likely push some people who smoke to make a quit attempt and may prevent some young people from starting to smoke," he said.

He also pointed to New Zealand, which has introduced very low nicotine cigarettes, as a leader in limiting the use of tobacco.

Mr Schwartz added: "These are the kinds of measures needed if we are serious about decreasing tobacco use."

Tobacco use continues to kill 48,000 Canadians each year.

"Tobacco use continues to be one of Canada's most significant public health problems, and is the country's leading preventable cause of disease and premature death in Canada," Public Services Minister Jean-Yves Duclos has previously said.

The Canadian Cancer Society, Canada's Heart and Stroke Foundation and the Canadian Lung Association have all praised the warning labels, saying they hope the measures will deter people, especially young people, from taking up smoking in the first place.

Cigarette smoking is widely regarded as a risk factor for lung cancer, heart disease and stroke.

In Canada, the rate of smokers aged 15 years or older is around 10%, according to a national 2021 Tobacco and Nicotine survey but electronic cigarette use has been on the rise.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If the ink causes cancer...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It will cancel out the cancer from smoking. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If they ignored the warning on the pack, they're gonna ignore these too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Agreed, it's a very stupid idea. They should print 'Known by the state of California to cause cancer' just to drive home how incredibly stupid this idea is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe "they" will. Worked on me though. Took sometime but after years of the warnings it finally sunk into me how dumb smoking was and I quit. Some people are not reachable but the anti smoking campaign is working because we've seen huge reduction in smokers since its started

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Education and awareness isn't the only reason we see less smokers.

Less harmful alternatives with the ability to allow users to taper off have now become common place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Poison in every Puff"

Don't threaten me with a good time!

Joking aside, I'm fairly ambivalent about this as a smoker. I hope it helps people avoid smoking but not sure how effective these warnings are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Former smoker. The specific medical warnings are good imo. "Poison in every puff" is a little too goofy and my inner teenager reaction is just "hell yeah" hahaha. Which is funny, but also counterproductive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Though if it just means it costs the cigarette companies a bit more to produce each cigarette and makes it harder for them to divert inventory for one market to another if their predictions turn out not so good, that's still a win.

Though, now I'm suddenly wondering why cigarette company profits aren't taxed at like 90%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Long time ago my brand was Death cigarettes. The pack had a skull on it and a portion of the price of packet went to cancer research. I knew that smoking was bad idea but it was an excellent drug delivery system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I quit smoking almost a decade ago. But I feel like if I was still smoking this would only make me want to smoke more. Watching the warnings slowly burn away would be relaxing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They fked up

They should've printed anatomical lungs on the cigarette that showed them getting darker with soot as the cig burns

More ominous and a picture is worth a 1000 words. And some ppl dont/cant read tbf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Completely and utterly pointless.

This will not change anything. It won't convince any more people to quit.

Smoking trends have been on the correct trajectory for decades now. I recall seeing a scientific study on Reddit a few years ago that stated in cases like this where people are faced with overwhelming evidence contrary to their current opinions or lifestyles, people tended to double and triple-down on their opinions and habits. The more push there was, the bigger the blow-back. People are stubborn even when it comes to their health.

I have little doubt that the smoking trend will continue to drop, but wasting ever more resources with gimmicks like this might actually slow that downward trend some. Smokers know cigarettes are dangerous and cause cancer. Everyone does. It is beyond common knowledge at this point. Just let it all play out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

oof you need to keep more up to date on that kind of data, the trend has reversed in recent years with teenage and childhood vaping creating a new pathway to smoking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In marketing, this would be considered an awareness campaign. The problem is, that everyone knows.

IMO, this is akin to Google advertising that their search engine exists, it's pretty good, and you should try it. Alternatively, it would be apple informing people that they make electronics like computers and cellphones.... (Not a specific one, just.... In general). Or Nike running ads to say that they make shoes.

Thanks, everyone knows that (household name) does (the thing it does), this is not helpful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I bet it would be a lot more effective if they just printed a penis down the length of every cigarette.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't it make smoking more cool?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My friend from Canada comes to visit and is a smoker. She brings packs with her and the entire pack is covered in warnings and pictures. I asked her if it bothers her and and she said, "I don't even notice them anymore." I highly doubt putting a warning on each cigarette is going to do anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People who have lung cancer continue to smoke in the hospital. Alcoholics continue to drink, even after massive accidents.

People addicted to things don't care.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It's not that they don't care, it's that they can't stop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Could someone smart enlighten me on why cigarettes continue to be allowed to be sold if we know that it causes cancer and costs the healthcare system millions (billions?) each year? I know we can't suddenly stop production overnight but can't they gradually putting a stricter ban on it until it's almost impossible to get? Is it smokers being too addicted? Is it tobacco lobby being too strong?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Remember prohibition?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Optionally we can do (worldwide) what Australia does: an additional 65% tax.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Is the paint cancerous?