this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

85921 readers
5204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What a complete joke that company is

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Yeah that 500b company printing money and disrupting the entire transportation industry. What πŸ‘ a πŸ‘ joke πŸ‘ lol.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

To be clear this isn't official results, this is what musk is projecting.

But the only think the big holders care about is their return rates. And they know Tesla is waaaaaaay overvalued. It's all based on hype.

So would Tesla be a better company free of musk?

Undoubtedly.

But they don't care about that. Musk hype drove the stock price up, no real company would be so overvalued. Without continued hype, the price goes down, which might cause a run on the stock and might end the company.

musk is Tesla. And it's why the company will be nothing but hype. Doesn't matter if the company loses money as long as stock price keeps going up.

Making quality vehicles isnt their business model, it's keeping the stock price up.

[–] ulkesh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Insane. No one person should have, or deserve, 56 billion dollars. And especially this piece of shit.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

You're acting like this was his standard salary. It wasn't. His contact, approved by shareholders at the time, basically offered him a King's ransom for an impossible miracle, defined with metrics like sales and stock price. Elon delivered the miracle. Love him or hate him, the conditions were met.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is this company still so valuable.

I would buy literally any other electric car than a Tesla.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have a huge head start. And their battery tech is top notch even if the rest of the vehicle is poorly build.

I'd personally never buy one either, for multiple reasons, but most people don't care/know about the shitty build quality, the shitty ai and the scummy locking features down remotely when you sell the car.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is the battery tech that good though? Genuinely don’t know.

Seems other manufacturers have a huge head start in every other area of manufacturing cars and even if they still lag behind on battery tech, it won’t be long before they catch up on this one metric, whereas Tesla would have to catch up on every other metric.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

It is. Their cooling / heating system along with the battery is top notch. Others are catching up though.

And yes in terms of fit and build quality most actual car manufacturers are ahead.

Of course you also have Ford an ICE manufacturer that's been building cars for centuries and still manages to produce shit with awful QA and constant recalls.