this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

TechTakes

2077 readers
35 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

AI artist Jason Allen

Absolute degenerate.

I have also spent some time screwing around with AI art generators. No way I'm addressing my self as an artist for it. AI art can be useful in certain situations such as whipping together a stupid meme to share between some friends. It's not any talent involved, and it's not something you should consider as copyright worthy.

Creating nice art is available to anyone. It just require some creativity and talent if you want to love of it. Being an artist is not some basic human right. As plenty of "artists" believe.

[–] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thank heavens we have people like you to police who gets to be called an artist or not...

[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not a protected title. Go to town with it.

But it's diluting the value of it if you carry no talent but want all the recognition.

[–] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So the value of art is directly tied to talent in your opinion?

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 1 points 9 months ago

What's next, value of products being directly tied to their quality??