this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11321 readers
87 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a cyclist, two people cycling side by side while other vehicles are waiting to pass is a bit of a dick move tbh.

Not illegal, and nothing compared to the shit that drivers do to cyclists, but still a bit of a dick move.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cycling two abreast is better for the driver, since they can overtake much quicker.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That image is quite a niche scenario and doesn’t represent the situation in the original image.

Obviously it’s different with a group of eight compared to just two people…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

niche scenario

Never been to a country where road cycling is massive then? Try living in anyplace that has Alps in it lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You’re right. I live in a city and have never seen more than four people cycling together.

It’s almost like cycling in the alps is a niche situation, and cycling in cities happens much more frequently 🤔

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree since overtaking a cyclist in the same lane is unsafe anyway. In the city I always cycle in the middle of the lane because it prevents unsafe takeovers and dooring.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This sub is pointless until it can provide a solution to having to get somewhere 30 miles from here when it's 10 below outside for most of the winter.

Dont give me that it's not always 10 below excuse. It is often 10 below or lower for long stretches in the north. Biking is simply not viable or practical.

Look at this example. Looks like it's 80 and sunny with the top down on a convertible and everyone in summer clothes.

Everyone doesn't live in Arizona, kar Karen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If we assume there isn't another solution to that, why does it matter? Why does your need for a car for your specific use negate any use of alternatives anywhere? We can still advocate for better transportation and land use in cities, even if the proposed solution doesn't work for your journey between Plunkett and Blucher.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Dont give me that it's not always 10 below excuse. It is often 10 below or lower for long stretches in the north. Biking is simply not viable or practical.

"It's sometimes cold, therefore you can never bike"

Solid take there.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

You left out the part where the ones on the bikes are going the fraction of the speed