this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
71 points (97.3% liked)

Science

14904 readers
1 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Specifically from their table:

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

If I had to superimpose my feelings on top of this, I'd increase dwelling area to 80 sqm and laptops/computers to 2 per household. 🥲

[–] JustVik@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

It's modest of course, but we can get used to it. I can use old computers quite well. :)

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's never been a question if we could do it. We just straight up won't. (or rich people won't, don't think many of us would care that much)

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

You know a great way to create jobs? Build homes using rich people’s tax dollars.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

It's a no-brainer, if a person's income were limited in such a way as to allow him a comfortable and comfortable life, there would be enough to provide this life for all humans. El problema son este 1% de assholes avariciosos que disponen de un 50% de toda la riquezas del mundo y queson los mismos que influyen o son los que hacen los leyes para protegerse.