this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

4842 readers
164 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Never touching another WD product with a ten foot pole.

[–] aPirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why I have not heard of them being a risky company to buy from, or am I misinformed?

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah same. I have plenty of WD Black HDDs and SSD's and never once had issues with any of them. Am I out of the loop?

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Their most recent products have shown very high failure rates and they refuse to acknowledge the problem.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

For HDDs, they seem to have a better reputation than Seagate. That being said, I usually buy their Gold "enterprise class" HDD drives.

[–] Spider89@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, was gonna say. Waiting for Samsung or SanDisk to do it. WD is quite the gamble.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WD owns SanDisk and has for some time.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't know that.

Their products are not at the same quality tho, or at least don't seem to perform the same.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They own sandisk and the sandisk fiasco is what I’m partly referring to. SanDisk is terrible.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh damn, totally missed all this going down. Been reading up on a bit now, such a shame. :/

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of these are using BiCS8 QLC NAND,

alright I've read enough, no thanks I'll pass

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have a feeling will be seeing QLC more and more in the consumer space.

I don't think consumers can even buy MLC SSDs anymore now that Samsung has switched its Pro SSD line to TLC.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

god damn I didn't realize that Samsung swapped

although tbf I've been buying more TeamGroups and Corsair M.2s when they go on sale as they typically have both TLC and DRAM cache

I don't think consumers can even buy MLC SSDs anymore now that Samsung has switched its Pro SSD line to TLC.

yeaa, I'd imagine you gotta pay for enterprise components from willing retailers and OEMs or on the second-hand market